ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
It/cs workshop: multimodal, multimedia courseware for teaching technical concepts in humanistic context
Full text PdfPdf (682 KB)
Source
Conference On Information Technology Education (formerly CITC) archive
Proceedings of the 9th ACM SIGITE conference on Information technology education table of contents
Cincinnati, OH, USA
SESSION: Session 1.2: IT education on-line table of contents
Pages 23-30  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-329-7
Authors
Mark S. Schmalz  University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
Lynn Conway  University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Sponsor
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 5,   Downloads (12 Months): 75,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1414558.1414567
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

As global competition in IT increases, IT/CS students must learn concepts, theory, and implementation more efficiently, more broadly (e.g., technical and humanistic context) and in greater technical depth. IT (esp. CS and mathematics) is data-intensive - teaching can suffer from information overload, particularly in Web-based courseware. Efforts to simplify IT/CS teaching sometimes result in technology overload, where students encounter technical detail without humanistic context (e.g., history, ethics, business aspects). Overload usually correlates with decreased comprehension, increased boredom, decreased learning, and potentially lower performance in applicative tasks.

In response to this problem, our paper describes IT/CS Workshop (ICW), an innovative, interactive Web-based paradigm for teaching and learning of technical concepts in a multi-level, multi-media humanistic context. ICW, under development at University of Florida, complements established undergraduate and graduate coursework and texts, by interactively presenting concepts at three modes or levels of abstraction:

(1) WorkShop - Students are assigned tasks similar to jobs in an industrial workshop, with interactive suggestions and helps;

(2) WorkBench - Technical views of Tools (e.g., concept, theory, example) and Techniques (implementation and analysis) are integrated with humanistic views of Environment (history and recycling of previous technology) and Society (ethics, interactive collaboration with experts and friends); and

(3) TestBench - Interactive analysis of results, quizzes, practice exams, and progress tracking help students evaluate their work, with pointers to remedial web pages.

For example, ICW's multi-media (audio-video lectures, animated examples, and sophisticated interactive analysis programs) support teaching of computer systems performance analysis (IT), algorithm complexity analysis (CS), and error propagation theory (Mathematics). Links to related Internet groups, websites, and scholarly articles support in-depth learning. ICW's multi-level, multi-media approach enriches teaching and learning, while reinforcing different learning styles and cultural views.

Additional features of ICW include creative exploration, whereby students can collaborate competitively, within loose constraints. This opens many new applications and approaches, and provides multiple data sources to support the semi-automatic or (eventually) automatic monitoring and modification of student learning behavior. Thus, instructors could extract metaphors for exploration, then apply these to the process of evaluating student progress. This paper describes ICW's software architecture, interfaces, and courseware generation techniques, with examples from IT (hardware performance) and CS (complexity analysis).


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Schenk, D. 1997. Data Smog, London: Abacus.
 
2
Gallagher, R. and T. Appenzeller. 1999. "Beyond reductionism", Science 284 (5411) 79.
3
 
4
Pressey, Sl. L. 1960. "Basic unresolved teaching machine problems", Theory Into Practice 1 30--37.
 
5
Schick, J. B. M. 1989. "Using computers to teach history," Organization of American Historians Annual Convention, St. Louis (April 1989).
 
6
Golas, K. C. 1993. "Estimating Time to Develop Interactive Courseware in the 1990s", in Proceedings of the 15th Interservice/Industry Training Systems and Education Conference, Orlando FL.
7
8
 
9
Schweitzer, D., L. Baird, M. Collins, and M. Sherman. 2006. "GRASP: A visualization tool for teaching security protocols", in Proceedings of the 10th Colloquium for Information Systems Security Education.
10
11
12
 
13
 
14
Key, G., M. S. Schmalz, F. M. Caimi, and G. X. Ritter. 1999. "Performance analysis of tabular nearest neighbor encoding algorithm for joint compression and ATR", Proceedings SPIE 3814 115--126.
 
15
Schmalz, M. S. and G. Key. 2008. "Hyperspectral signature classification with tabular nearest-neighbor encoding", in Proceedings of the AMOS 2007 Conference, Maui Hawaii.
 
16
Conway, L. 1981. "The MPC Adventures: Experiences with the Generation of VLSI Design and Implementation Methodologies", Xerox PARC Technical Report VLSI-81-2.
 
17
Vassileva J. 1995. "Dynamic courseware generation: At the cross point of CAL, ITS and authoring", in Proceedings of ICCE'95, Singapore, AACE: Charlottesville, 290--297.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Mark S. Schmalz: colleagues
Lynn Conway: colleagues