Performance-based functional assessment: an algorithm for measuring physical capabilities

ABSTRACT

The description of users with motor limitations is a significant dilemma for accessibility researchers and system designers alike. Current practice is to use descriptors such as medical diagnoses to represent a person's physical capabilities. This solution is not adequate due to similarities in functional capabilities between diagnoses as well as differences in capabilities within a diagnosis. An alternative is user self-reporting or observation by another person. These solutions are also problematic because they rely on individual interpretation of capabilities. The current research focuses on defining an objective, quantitative and repeatable methodology for assessing a person's physical capabilities in relation to use of computer technology. Results from this initial study are encouraging, including the development of a model which accounts for up to 85% of the variance in user capabilities.

REFERENCES

• 1: Faustina Hwang , Simeon Keates , Patrick Langdon , P. John Clarkson , Peter Robinson, Perception and haptics: towards more accessible computers for motion-impaired users, Proceedings of the 2001 workshop on Perceptive user interfaces, November 15-16, 2001, Orlando, Florida [doi>10.1145/971478.971507]
• 2: Sherry Perdue Casali, A physical skills based strategy for choosing an appropriate interface method, Extra-ordinary human-computer interaction: interfaces for users with disabilities, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, 1995
• 3: Frey, W. D. 1984. Functional assessment in the '80s: A conceptual enigma, a technical challenge. In Functional Assessment in Rehabilitation, A.S. Halpern & M.J. Fuhrer, Eds. Paul H. Brookes Publishing Company, 1--43.
• 4: Dittmar, S. S., & Gresham, G. E. 1997. Functional assessment and outcome measures for the rehabilitation health professional. Aspen Publishers, Inc.
• 5: Shehu, B. B., & Ismail, N. J. 2004. Practical management of spinal cord injury, Annals of African Medicine, 3, 1, 46--52.
• 6: Williams, K. 1991. Functional capacity evaluation of the upper extremity, Work, 1, 3, 48--64.
• 7: Gresham, G. E., Labi, M. L., Dittmar, S. S., Hicks, J. T., Joyce, S. Z., & Phillips-Stehlik, M. A. 1986. The Quadriplegia Index of Function (QIF): Sensitivity and reliability demonstrated in a study of thirty quadriplegic patients, Paraplegia. 24, 38--44.
• 8: Meenan, R. F., Gertman, P. M., & Mason, J. H. 1980. Measuring health status in Arthritis: The Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales, Arthritis and Rheumatism, 23, 2, 146--152.
• 9: Clark, G. S., & Granger, C. V. 2002. Functional assessment for outcome analysis. In Physical medicine and rehabilitation secrets (2nd ed., Rev.) B.J. O'Young, M.A. Young & S.A. Stiens Eds. Hanley and Belfus, 9--14.
• 10: Sears. A., Young, M., and Feng, J. 2007. Physical Disabilities and Computing Technologies: An Analysis of Impairments. In A. Sears and J. Jacko (Eds), The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook, CRC Press, 829--852.
• 11: Constantine E. Steriadis , Philip Constantinou, Designing human-computer interfaces for quadriplegic people, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), v.10 n.2, p.87-118, June 2003 [doi>10.1145/772047.772049]
• 12: Simeon Keates , Faustina Hwang , Patrick Langdon , P. John Clarkson , Peter Robinson, Cursor measures for motion-impaired computer users, Proceedings of the fifth international ACM conference on Assistive technologies, July 08-10, 2002, Edinburgh, Scotland [doi>10.1145/638249.638274]
• 13: Faustina Hwang , Simeon Keates , Patrick Langdon , John Clarkson, Mouse movements of motion-impaired users: a submovement analysis, Proceedings of the 6th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility, October 18-20, 2004, Atlanta, GA, USA
• 14: Scherer, M. J. 2002. Matching consumers with appropriate assistive technologies. In D.A. Olson & F. DeRuyter (Eds.) Clinician's guide to assistive technology. Mosby, 3--13.
• 15: Barker, P. 2002. Technologies for information, communication, and access. In D.A. Olson & F. DeRuyter (Eds.) Clinician's guide to assistive technology. 89--90.
• 16: W. Buxton , R. Foulds , M. Rosen , L. Scadden , F. Shein, Human interface design and the handicapped user, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.291-297, April 13-17, 1986, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
• 17: Peter Gregor , Alan F. Newell , Mary Zajicek, Designing for dynamic diversity: interfaces for older people, Proceedings of the fifth international ACM conference on Assistive technologies, July 08-10, 2002, Edinburgh, Scotland [doi>10.1145/638249.638277]
• 18: Treviranus, J., & Petty, L. 2002. Computer access. In D.A. Olson & F. DeRuyter (Eds.) Clinician's guide to assistive technology. 91--113.
• 19: Cook, A. M., & Hussey, S. M. 2002. Control interfaces for assistive technology. In K. Conklin (Ed.) Assistive technologies: Principles and practice (2nd ed.) 212--254.
• 20: Folstein MF, Folstein S.E., McHugh P.R. 1975. Mini-mental state. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of psychiatric research 12, 3, 189--198.
• 21: Parkhurst, D. November 7, 2002. Collecting data from the P5 data glove. Johns Hopkins University. Baltimore, MD, http://cnslab.mb.jhu.edu/derrick/personal/P5/index.html
• 22: Lavergne, P. 2008. Multicollinearity. Simon Fraser University. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, http://www.sfu.ca/~pascall/buec333/chap8.pdf
• 23: Umesh Persad , Patrick Langdon , John Clarkson, Characterising user capabilities to support inclusive design evaluation, Universal Access in the Information Society, v.6 n.2, p.119-135, August 2007 [doi>10.1007/s10209-007-0083-y]

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  K. Computing Milieux
  K.4 COMPUTERS AND SOCIETY
      K.4.2 Social Issues
          Subjects: Assistive technologies for persons with disabilities

General Terms:
Algorithms, Design, Experimentation, Human Factors, Measurement, Performance, Theory, Verification

Keywords:
HCI, accessibility, functional assessment, physical capabilities