A pilot study of comparative customer comprehension between extreme x-machine and uml models

ABSTRACT

Many design notations are used during software development to help the developers better understand the required system. However they are infrequently shown to clients, partly because developers believe that clients don't understand them. In this study we investigate the extent to which clients comprehend three types of diagram. Two popular UML diagrams (activity and use case) and Extreme X-Machines diagrams (a type of state diagram developed to support Extreme Programming) were shown to three clients for whom we had recently delivered the software that was represented. The clients were given some simple guidance on interpreting them and asked to evaluate how well they understood them. This pilot study found that all the diagrams studied seemed to be equally well understood, but further studies are required to evaluate their usefulness.

REFERENCES

• 1: Kent Beck , Cynthia Andres, Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change (2nd Edition), Addison-Wesley Professional, 2004
• 2: Cohen, J. 1988 Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Erlbaum
• 3: Constantine, L. L. 2001. Management Forum. Software Development, 9 (6). 16--28.
• 4: Brian Dobing , Jeffrey Parsons, How UML is used, Communications of the ACM, v.49 n.5, p.109-113, May 2006 [doi>10.1145/1125944.1125949]
• 5: Samuel Eilenberg, Automata, Languages, and Machines, Academic Press, Inc., Orlando, FL, 1974
• 6: Holcombe, M. and Ipate, F. 1998 Correct Systems - building a business process solution. Springer-Verlag.
• 7: Krasteval, I. and Llieva, S. 2007. Rush into Agile - Analytical Framework for Agile Practices Applicability. In Proceedings of the Agile Manufacturing, 2007. ICAM 2007. IET International Conference on, 229--238.
• 8: Ian Sommerville, Software Engineering (7th Edition), Pearson Addison Wesley, 2004
• 9: Thomson, C. 2007 Defining and Describing Change Events in Software Development Projects. Doctoral Thesis. Department of Computer Science, University of Sheffield.
• 10: Thomson, C. and Holcombe, W. 2003. Applying XP Ideas Formally: The Story Card and Extreme X-Machines. In Proceedings of the 1st South-East European Workshop on Formal Methods, South-East European Research Centre, 57--71.
• 11: Thomson, C. and Holcombe, W. 2005. Using a formal method to model software design in XP projects. In Proceedings of the 2nd South-East European Workshop on Formal Methods, South-East European Research Centre.
• 12: Turk, D., France, R. and Rumpe, B. 2002. Limitations of Agile Software Processes. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on eXtreme Programming and Agile Processes in Software Engineering (XP 2002).

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  D. Software
  D.2 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
      D.2.2 Design Tools and Techniques
          Subjects: Object-oriented design methods

Additional Classification:
  D. Software
  D.2 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
      D.2.2 Design Tools and Techniques
          Subjects: State diagrams

General Terms:
Documentation, Experimentation, Human Factors, Measurement

Keywords:
customer, empirical, extreme x-machines, formal method, requirements elicitation, testing, xxm