Pair programming: what's in it for me?

ABSTRACT

Pair programming is a practice in which two programmers work collaboratively at one computer on the same design, algorithm, or code. Prior research on pair programming has primarily focused on its evaluation in academic settings. There has been limited evidence on the use, problems and benefits, partner selection, and the general perceptions towards pair programming in industrial settings. In this paper we report on a longitudinal evaluation of pair programming at Microsoft Corporation. We find from the results of a survey sent to a randomly selected 10% of engineers at Microsoft that 22% pair program or have pair programmed in the past. Using qualitative analysis, we performed a large-scale card sort to group the various benefits and problems of pair programming. The biggest perceived benefits of pair programming were the introduction of fewer bugs, spreading code understanding, and producing overall higher quality code. The top problems were cost-efficiency, (work time) scheduling problems, and personality conflicts. Most engineers preferred a partner who had complementary skills to their own, who was flexible and had good communication skills.

REFERENCES

• 1: Erik Arisholm , Hans Gallis , Tore Dyba , Dag I.K. Sjoberg, Evaluating Pair Programming with Respect to System Complexity and Programmer Expertise, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, v.33 n.2, p.65-86, February 2007 [doi>10.1109/TSE.2007.17]
• 2: Victor R. Basili , Forrest Shull , Filippo Lanubile, Building Knowledge through Families of Experiments, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, v.25 n.4, p.456-473, July 1999 [doi>10.1109/32.799939]
• 3: Kent Beck , Cynthia Andres, Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change (2nd Edition), Addison-Wesley Professional, 2004
• 4: Andrew Begel , Nachiappan Nagappan, Usage and Perceptions of Agile Software Development in an Industrial Context: An Exploratory Study, Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, p.255-264, September 20-21, 2007 [doi>10.1109/ESEM.2007.85]
• 5: J. Bevan , L. Werner , C. McDowell, Guidelines for the Use of Pair Programming in a Freshman Programming Class, Proceedings of the 15th Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training, p.100, February 25-27, 2002
• 6: C. Bishop-Clark and D. D. Wheeler, "The Myers-Briggs personality type and its relationship to computer programming", Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 26(3), pp. 358--370, Spring 1994.
• 7: Jan Chong , Tom Hurlbutt, The Social Dynamics of Pair Programming, Proceedings of the 29th international conference on Software Engineering, p.354-363, May 20-26, 2007 [doi>10.1109/ICSE.2007.87]
• 8: Alistair Cockburn , Laurie Williams, The costs and benefits of pair programming, Extreme programming examined, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, 2001
• 9: Hanna Hulkko , Pekka Abrahamsson, A multiple case study on the impact of pair programming on product quality, Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Software engineering, May 15-21, 2005, St. Louis, MO, USA [doi>10.1145/1062455.1062545]
• 10: Neha Katira , Laurie Williams , Eric Wiebe , Carol Miller , Suzanne Balik , Ed Gehringer, On understanding compatibility of student pair programmers, Proceedings of the 35th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, March 03-07, 2004, Norfolk, Virginia, USA
• 11: Thomas D. LaToza , Gina Venolia , Robert DeLine, Maintaining mental models: a study of developer work habits, Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Software engineering, May 20-28, 2006, Shanghai, China [doi>10.1145/1134285.1134355]
• 12: Charlie McDowell , Linda Werner , Heather Bullock , Julian Fernald, The effects of pair-programming on performance in an introductory programming course, Proceedings of the 33rd SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, February 27-March 03, 2002, Cincinnati, Kentucky
• 13: Charlie McDowell , Linda Werner , Heather E. Bullock , Julian Fernald, The impact of pair programming on student performance, perception and persistence, Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Software Engineering, May 03-10, 2003, Portland, Oregon
• 14: M. M. Müller and O. Hagner, "Experiment about Test-first Programming", Proceedings of Conference on Empirical Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE), pp. 2002.
• 15: Nachiappan Nagappan , Laurie Williams , Miriam Ferzli , Eric Wiebe , Kai Yang , Carol Miller , Suzanne Balik, Improving the CS1 experience with pair programming, Proceedings of the 34th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, February 19-23, 2003, Reno, Navada, USA
• 16: N. Nagappan, L. Williams, E. Wiebe, C. Miller, S. Balik, M. Ferzli, and J. Petlick, "Pair Learning: With an Eye Toward Future Success", Proceedings of Extreme Programming/Agile Universe, New Orleans, pp. 2003.
• 17: J. Nawrocki and A. Wojciechowski, "Experimental Evaluation of Pair Programming", Proceedings of European Software Control and Metrics (ESCOM 2001), London, England, pp. 2001.
• 18: Forrest Shull , Janice Singer , Dag I.K. Sjøberg, Guide to Advanced Empirical Software Engineering, Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., Secaucus, NJ, 2007
• 19: Laurie Williams , Robert Kessler, Pair Programming Illuminated, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, 2002
• 20: Laurie Williams , Robert R. Kessler , Ward Cunningham , Ron Jeffries, Strengthening the Case for Pair Programming, IEEE Software, v.17 n.4, p.19-25, July 2000 [doi>10.1109/52.854064]
• 21: Laurie Williams , Charlie McDowell , Nachiappan Nagappan , Julian Fernald , Linda Werner, Building Pair Programming Knowledge through a Family of Experiments, Proceedings of the 2003 International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering, p.143, September 30-October 01, 2003

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  D. Software
  D.2 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
      D.2.9 Management
          Subjects: Programming teams

General Terms:
Human Factors, Measurement

Keywords:
developers, empirical studies, pair programming, survey experiments