ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Dynamic privacy assessment in a smart house environment using multimodal sensing
Full text PdfPdf (5.15 MB)
Source
ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications (TOMCCAP) archive
Volume 5 ,  Issue 2  (November 2008) table of contents
Article No. 10  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISSN:1551-6857
Authors
Simon Moncrieff  Curtin University of Technology, Perth, W. Australia
Svetha Venkatesh  Curtin University of Technology, Perth, W. Australia
Geoff West  Curtin University of Technology, Perth, W. Australia
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 40,   Downloads (12 Months): 397,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1413862.1413863
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Surveillance applications in private environments such as smart houses require a privacy management policy if such systems are to be accepted by the occupants of the environment. This is due to the invasive nature of surveillance, and the private nature of the home. In this article, we propose a framework for dynamically altering the privacy policy applied to the monitoring of a smart house based on the situation within the environment. Initially the situation, or context, within the environment is determined; we identify several factors for determining environmental context, and propose methods to quantify the context using audio and binary sensor data. The context is then mapped to an appropriate privacy policy, which is implemented by applying data hiding techniques to control access to data gathered from various information sources. The significance of this work lies in the examination of privacy issues related to assisted-living smart house environments. A single privacy policy in such applications would be either too restrictive for an observer, for example, a carer, or too invasive for the occupants. We address this by proposing a dynamic method, with the aim of decreasing the invasiveness of the technology, while retaining the purpose of the system.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Altman, I. 1975. The Environment and Social Behavior: Privacy, Personal Space, Territory and Crowding. Brooks/Cole Publishing Co., Inc., Monterey, CA.
 
2
 
3
Boyer, J. P., Tan, K., and Gunter, C. A. 2006. Privacy sensitive location information systems in smart buildings. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference for Security in Pervasive Computing. Springer Berlin, York, England.
 
4
Chen, J., Kam, A. H., Zhang, J., Liu, N., and Shue, L. 2005. Bathroom activity monitoring based on sound. In Pervasive Comput. Springer Berlin, Munich, Germany, 47--61.
 
5
Das, S. and Cook, D. J. 2004. Health monitoring in an agent-based smart home. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Smart Homes and Health Telematics (ICOST). IOS Press, Singapore.
 
6
 
7
 
8
9
10
 
11
12
13
 
14
 
15
Martinez-Ponte, I., Desurmont, X., Meessen, J., and Delaigle, J.-F. 2005. Robust human face hiding ensuring privacy. In Proceedings of the Workshop on the Integration of Knowledge, Semantics and Digital Media Technology (WIAMIS'05). SPIE, Montreux, Switzerland.
 
16
Moncrieff, S., Venkatesh, S., and West, G. 2007a. Dynamic privacy in a smart house environment. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo. IEEE Computer Society, 2034--2037.
17
18
 
19
 
20
Neustaedter, C. and Greenberg, S. 2003. The design of a context-aware home media space for balancing privacy and awareness. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing. Springer Berlin, Seattle,WA, 297--314.
 
21
Nixon, P. A., Wagealla, W., English, C., and Terzis, S. 2004. Smart Environments: Technology, Protocols, and Applications. Wiley, Arlington, TX, Chapter Security, Privacy and Trust Issues in Smart Environments, 249--270.
22
 
23
Rabiner, L. and Juang, B. 1978. Digital Processing of Speech Signals. Signal Processing Series. Prentice Hall Press, New Jersey.
 
24
 
25
Stauffer, C. and Grimson, W. 1999. Adaptive background mixture models for real-time tracking. In IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 1999. Vol. 2. IEEE Computer Society, Fort Collins, CO USA, 246--252.
 
26
27
 
28
 
29
 
30

Collaborative Colleagues:
Simon Moncrieff: colleagues
Svetha Venkatesh: colleagues
Geoff West: colleagues