ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
The cost of doing science on the cloud: the Montage example
Full text PdfPdf (298 KB)
Source Conference on High Performance Networking and Computing archive
Proceedings of the 2008 ACM/IEEE conference on Supercomputing - Volume 00 table of contents
Austin, Texas
SECTION: Papers table of contents
Article No. 50  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-4244-2835-9
Authors
Ewa Deelman  USC Information Sciences Institute, Marina del Rey, CA
Gurmeet Singh  USC Information Sciences Institute, Marina del Rey, CA
Miron Livny  University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, WI
Bruce Berriman  California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA
John Good  California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA
Publisher
IEEE Press  Piscataway, NJ, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 60,   Downloads (12 Months): 537,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  

ABSTRACT

Utility grids such as the Amazon EC2 cloud and Amazon S3 offer computational and storage resources that can be used on-demand for a fee by compute and data-intensive applications. The cost of running an application on such a cloud depends on the compute, storage and communication resources it will provision and consume. Different execution plans of the same application may result in significantly different costs. Using the Amazon cloud fee structure and a real-life astronomy application, we study via simulation the cost performance tradeoffs of different execution and resource provisioning plans. We also study these trade-offs in the context of the storage and communication fees of Amazon S3 when used for long-term application data archival. Our results show that by provisioning the right amount of storage and compute resources, cost can be significantly reduced with no significant impact on application performance.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
"Open Science Grid,"www.opensciencegrid.org.
 
2
"TeraGrid,"http://www.teragrid.org/.
 
3
"Enabling Grids for E-sciencE (EGEE),"http://www.euegee. org/.
 
4
"TeraGrid Resource Reservations," www.teragrid.org/userinfo/resource_reservation.php
 
5
"Special Priority and Urgent Computing Environment," http://spruce.teragrid.org.
 
6
 
7
"Amazon Web Services," http://aws.amazon.com,http://aws.amazon.com.
 
8
"Google App Engine,"http://code.google.com/appengine/.
 
9
"Montage Project," http://montage.ipac.caltech.edu.
 
10
The Two Micron All Sky Survey., "http://www.ipac.caltech.edu/2mass," -+*.
 
11
Sloan Digital Sky Survey., "http://www.sdss.org/."
 
12
"Image Mosaic Service," http://hachi.ipac.caltech.edu:8080/montage/.
 
13
E. Deelman, G. Mehta, et al., "Pegasus: Mapping Large- Scale Workflows to Distributed Resources," in Workflows in e-Science, I. Taylor, E. Deelman, et al., Eds.: Springer, 2006.
 
14
"REST vs SOAP at Amazon," http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/wlg/3005?wlg=yes.
 
15
 
16
 
17
R. Buyya and M. Murshed, "GridSim: A Toolkit for the Modeling and Simulation of Distributed Resource Management and Scheduling for Grid Computing," Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, vol. 14, pp. 1175-1220, 2002.
 
18
R. Buyya, D. Abramson, et al., "The grid economy," Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 93, pp. 698-714, 2005.
 
19
 
20
K. Lai, B. A. Huberman, et al., "Tycoon: a Distributed Market-based Resource Allocation System," Technical Report, Hewlett-Packard Laboratories, Palo Alto, CA, September2004.
 
21
"IBM Blue Cloud," http://www- 03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/22613.wss.
 
22
"Nirvanix," http://www.nirvanix.com.
 
23
M. Palankar, A. Onibokun, et al., "Amazon S3 for Science Grids: a Viable Solution," in 4th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design & Implementation (NSDI'07), 2007.
24
 
25
H. Zhao and R. Sakellariou, "Advance Reservation Policies for Workflows," in 12th Workshop on Job Scheduling Strategies for Parallel Processing (JSSPP), Saint-Malo, France, 2006.
 
26
G. Singh, C. Kesselman, et al., "Performance Impact of Resource Provisioning on Workflows," USC http://www.cs.usc.edu/Research/TechReports/05- 850.pdf 05-850, 2005.
 
27
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
G. Singh, C. Kesselman, et al., "Adaptive Pricing for Resource Reservations in Shared Environments," Grid 2007.
 
32
 
33
"Nimbus Science Cloud," http://workspace.globus.org/clouds/nimbus.html.
 
34
"Amazon SLA," http://www.amazon.com/gp/browse.html?node=379654 011.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Ewa Deelman: colleagues
Gurmeet Singh: colleagues
Miron Livny: colleagues
Bruce Berriman: colleagues
John Good: colleagues