ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
HealthSense: classification of health-related sensor data through user-assisted machine learning
Full text PdfPdf (504 KB)
Source
Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications archive
Proceedings of the 9th workshop on Mobile computing systems and applications table of contents
Napa Valley, California
SESSION: Making sense of your sensors table of contents
Pages 1-5  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-118-7
Authors
Erich P. Stuntebeck  Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia
John S. Davis, II  LingFling, Inc., Arlington, Virginia
Gregory D. Abowd  Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia
Marion Blount  IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Hawthorne, New York
Sponsor
SIGMOBILE: ACM Special Interest Group on Mobility of Systems, Users, Data and Computing
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 20,   Downloads (12 Months): 152,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1411759.1411761
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Remote patient monitoring generates much more data than healthcare professionals are able to manually interpret. Automated detection of events of interest is therefore critical so that these points in the data can be marked for later review. However, for some important chronic health conditions, such as pain and depression, automated detection is only partially achievable. To assist with this problem we developed HealthSense, a framework for real-time tagging of health-related sensor data. HealthSense transmits sensor data from the patient to a server for analysis via machine learning techniques. The system uses patient input to assist with classification of interesting events (e.g., pain or itching). Due to variations between patients, sensors, and condition types, we presume that our initial classification is imperfect and accommodate this by incorporating user feedback into the machine learning process. This is done by occasionally asking the patient whether they are experiencing the condition being monitored. Their response is used to confirm or reject the classification made by the server and continually improve the accuracy of the classifier's decisions on what data is of interest to the health-care provider.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
A. Cárdenas, R. Pon, and R. Cameron, "Management of Streaming Body Sensor Data for Medical Information Systems," Proceedings of METMBS 2003, Las Vegas, NV, pp. 186--191, 2003.
5
6
7
 
8
J. Lester, T. Choudhury and B. Borriello, "A Practical Approach to Recognizing Physical Activities," Pervasive 2006, LNCS 3968, pp. 1--16, 2006.
 
9
J. Lester, T. Choudhury, N. Kern, G. Borriello and B. Hannaford, "A Hybrid Discriminative/Generative Approach for Modeling Human Activities," Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 766--722, Edinburgh, Scotland, 2005.
 
10
E. Tapia, S. Intille, and K. Larson, "Activity Recognition in the Home Using Simple and Ubiquitous Sensors," Pervasive 2004, LNCS 3001, pp. 158--175, 2004.
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17

Collaborative Colleagues:
Erich P. Stuntebeck: colleagues
John S. Davis, II: colleagues
Gregory D. Abowd: colleagues
Marion Blount: colleagues