ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Fast and reliable resampling detection by spectral analysis of fixed linear predictor residue
Full text PdfPdf (978 KB)
Source
International Multimedia Conference archive
Proceedings of the 10th ACM workshop on Multimedia and security table of contents
Oxford, United Kingdom
SESSION: Forensics table of contents
Pages 11-20  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-058-6
Author
Matthias Kirchner  TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGMULTIMEDIA: ACM Special Interest Group on Multimedia
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 29,   Downloads (12 Months): 143,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1411328.1411333
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper revisits the state-of-the-art resampling detector, which is based on periodic artifacts in the residue of a local linear predictor. Inspired by recent findings from the literature, we take a closer look at the complex detection procedure and model the detected artifacts in the spatial and frequency domain by means of the variance of the prediction residue. We give an exact formulation on how transformation parameters influence the appearance of periodic artifacts and analytically derive the expected position of characteristic resampling peaks. We present an equivalent accelerated and simplified detector, which is orders of magnitudes faster than the conventional scheme and experimentally shown to be comparably reliable.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
A. Dempster, N. Laird, and D. Rubin. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 39(1):1--38, 1977.
 
2
 
3
M. Goljan and J. Fridrich. Camera identification from scaled and cropped images. In E. J. Delp et al., editors, Security, Forensics, Steganography, and Watermarking of Multimedia Contents X, volume 6819, 68190E, 2008.
 
4
B. Jähne. Digital Image Processing. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 6th edition, 2005.
 
5
A. D. Ker and R. Böhme. Revisiting weighted stego-image steganalysis. In E. J. Delp et al., editors, Security, Forensics, Steganography, and Watermarking of Multimedia Contents X, volume 6819, 681905, 2008.
 
6
M. Kirchner and R. Böhme. Tamper hiding: Defeating image forensics. In T. Furon et al., editors, Information Hiding, 9th International Workshop, LNCS 4567, 326--341, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2007. Springer Verlag.
 
7
 
8
A. C. Popescu. Statistical Tools for Digital Image Forensics. PhD thesis, Department of Computer Science, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA, 2005.
 
9
A. C. Popescu and H. Farid. Exposing digital forgeries by detecting traces of re-sampling. IEEE Trans. on Signal Processing, 53(2):758--767, 2005.
 
10
A. C. Popescu and H. Farid. Exposing digital forgeries in color filter array interpolated images. IEEE Trans. on Signal Processing, 53(10):3948--3959, 2005.
 
11
S. Prasad and K. Ramakrishnan. On resampling detection and its application to detect image tampering. In Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and EXPO, 1325--1328, 2006.
 
12
H. T. Sencar and N. Memon. Overview of State-of-the-art in Digital Image Forensics. World Scientific Press, 2008.
 
13