ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Distributed and Secure Bootstrapping of Mobile Ad Hoc Networks: Framework and Constructions
Full text PdfPdf (400 KB)
Source
ACM Transactions on Information and System Security (TISSEC) archive
Volume 12 ,  Issue 1  (October 2008) table of contents
Article No. 2  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISSN:1094-9224
Authors
Shouhuai Xu  University of Texas
Srdjan Čapkun  ETH Zurich
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 36,   Downloads (12 Months): 333,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1410234.1410236
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Secure bootstrapping of mobile ad hoc networks (MANETs) is a challenging problem in scenarios in which network users (or nodes) do not share trust relationships prior to the network deployment. In recent years, a number of schemes have been proposed to solve this problem, assuming either no or limited trust between the nodes prior to their deployment. Despite numerous proposals, there is no common understanding of the proposed schemes and of the trade-offs that they provide. This has consequences for both researchers and practitioners, who do not have a clear idea how to compare the schemes and how to select a scheme for a given application. In this article, we present a framework that helps in understanding and comparing schemes for secure bootstrapping of MANETs. The framework is general because it is policy-neutral and can accommodate many existing bootstrapping schemes. The proposed framework can equally serve as a good basis for the development of new MANET bootstrapping schemes; we show how the development of the framework leads to two new (classes of) distributed bootstrapping schemes. Within the framework, we not only investigate and characterize the properties of the relevant bootstrapping schemes, but also give methods for practitioners to select the relevant system parameters in the Random Walk and the (Restricted) Random Waypoint mobility models.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Aldous, D. J. and Fill, A. 2000. Markov chains on graphs. Manuscript under preparation.
 
2
 
3
Asokan, N. and Ginzboorg, P. 2000. Key management in ad hoc networks. Comput. Comm., 23, 1627--1637.
 
4
Balfanz, D., Smetters, D., Stewart, P., and Wong, H. 2002. Talking to strangers: Authentication in ad-hoc wireless networks. In Proceedings of the Network and Distributed Systems Security Symposium (NDSS'02). The Internet Society, San Diego, CA.
5
 
6
Bechler, M., Hof, H., Kraft, D., Pahlke, F., and Wolf, L. 2004. A cluster-based security architecture for ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of the Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (INFOCOM'04).
 
7
Bellare, M. and Rogaway, P. 1996. The exact security of digital signatures - how to sign with rsa and rabin. In Proceedings of the International Conference on the Theory and Application of Crytographic Techniques (EUROCRYPT'96). 399--416.
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
Čagalj, M. and Hubaux, J. P. 2004. Key agreement over a radio link. Tech. Rep. IC/2004/16, EPFL-DI-ICA. January.
 
12
Čagalj, M., Čapkun, S., and Hubaux, J.-P. 2006. Key agreement in peer-to-peer wireless networks. Proceedings of the IEEE, to appear.
 
13
Camp, T., Boleng, J., and Davies, V. 2002. A survey of mobility models for ad hoc network research. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing: Special Issue on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking: Research, Trends and Applications, 2, 5, 483--502.
 
14
Camtepe, S. and Yener, B. 2004. Combinatorial design of key distribution mechanisms for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 9th European Symposium on Research Computer Security (ESORICS'04). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3193. 293--308.
 
15
16
 
17
Chan, A. 2004. Distributed symmetric key management for mobile ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of the Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (INFOCOM'04).
 
18
Chan, H. and Perrig, A. 2005. Pike: Peer intermediaries for key establishment in sensor networks. In Proceedings of the Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (INFOCOM'05).
 
19
 
20
21
 
22
Ellis, R. Torus Hitting Times Project. http://www.math.tamu.edu/~rellis/comb/torus/torus.html.
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
Grossglauser, M. and Vetterli, M. 2003. Locating nodes with ease: Mobility diffusion of last encounters in ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of the Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (INFOCOM'03).
 
28
Hoepman, J. 2004. The ephemeral pairing problem. In Proceedings of Financial Cryptography (FC'04). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3110. 212--226.
29
30
 
31
 
32
Krawczyk, H. 2003. Sigma: The “sign-and-mac” approach to authenticated Diffie-Hellman and its use in the ike-protocols. In Proceedings of the Annual International Cryptology Conference (CRYPTO'03). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2729. 400--425.
 
33
Lee, J. and Stinson, D. 2004. Deterministic key predistribution schemes for distributed sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop Selected Areas in Cryptography (SAC'04). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3357. 294--307.
34
 
35
 
36
37
38
 
39
Papadimitratos, P. and Haas, Z. J. 2002. Secure routing for mobile ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of the Communication Networks and Distributed Systems Modeling and Simulation Conference (CNDS'02).
40
 
41
 
42
Doyle, P. G. and Snell, J. L. 2001. Random walks and electric networks. Number 22. Carus Mathematical Monographs.
 
43
Shah, R. C., Roy, S., Jain, S., and Brunette, W. 2003. Data MULEs: Modeling a three-tier architecture for sparse sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Sensor Network Protocols and Applications (SNPA'03).
44
 
45
Saxena, N. 2006. Public key cryptography sans certificates in ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference Applied Cryptography and Network Security (ACNS'06). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3989. 375--389.
 
46
 
47
 
48
TCG. Trusted computing group (tcg) specifications. https://www.trustedcomputinggroup.org/home.
 
49
Vaudenay, S. 2005. Secure communications over insecure channels based on short authenticated strings. In Advances in Cryptology---Crypto'05. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 309--326. Lecture Notes in Computer Science No. 3621.
 
50
Wu, J. and Wei, R. 2005. Comments on “distributed symmetric key management for mobile ad hoc networks” from infocom 2004. Cryptology ePrint Archive, Report 2005/008. Available at http://eprint.iacr.org/.
 
51
Xu, G. and Iftode, L. 2004. Locality driven key management architecture for mobile ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Mobile Ad Hoc and Sensor Systems (MOBIHOC'04). 436--446.
 
52
Yi, S. and Kravets, R. 2003. Moca: Mobile certificate authority for wireless ad hoc networks. In The 2nd Annual PKI Research Workshop (PKI'03).
 
53
Yoon, J., Liu, M., and Noble, B. 2003. Random Waypoint Considered Harmful. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (InfoCom'03). San Francisco.
 
54
Zhou, L. and Haas, Z. 1999. Securing ad hoc networks. IEEE Networks, 13, 6, 24--30.
 
55

Collaborative Colleagues:
Shouhuai Xu: colleagues
Srdjan Čapkun: colleagues