ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Assessment of urban-scale wireless networks with a small number of measurements
Full text PdfPdf (499 KB)
Source
International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking archive
Proceedings of the 14th ACM international conference on Mobile computing and networking table of contents
San Francisco, California, USA
SESSION: Experimental networks table of contents
Pages 187-198  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-096-8
Authors
Joshua Robinson  Rice University, Houston, TX, USA
Ram Swaminathan  HP Labs, Palo Alto, CA, USA
Edward W. Knightly  Rice University, Houston, TX, USA
Sponsors
SIGMOBILE: ACM Special Interest Group on Mobility of Systems, Users, Data and Computing
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 27,   Downloads (12 Months): 333,   Citation Count: 3
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1409944.1409967
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In order to evaluate, improve, or expand a deployed, city-wide wireless mesh network, it is necessary to assess the network's spatial performance. In this paper, we present a general framework to accurately predict a network's well-served area, termed the metric region, via a small number of measurements. Assessment of deployed networks must address two key issues: non-uniform physical-layer propagation and high spatial variance in performance. Addressing non-uniformity, our framework estimates a mesh node's metric region via a data-driven sectorization of the region. We find each sector's boundary (radius) with a two-stage process of estimation and then measurement-driven "push-pull" refinement of the estimated boundary. To address high spatial variation, our coverage estimation couples signal strength measurements with terrain information from publicly available digital maps to estimate propagation characteristics between a wireless node and the client's location. To limit measurements and yield connected metric regions, we consider performance metrics (such as signal strength) to be monotonic with distance from the wireless node within each sector. We show that despite measured violations in coverage monotonicity, we obtain high accuracy with this assumption. We validate our estimation and refinement framework with measurements from 30,000 client locations obtained in each of two currently operational mesh networks, GoogleWiFi and TFA. We study three illustrative metrics: coverage, modulation rate, and redundancy, and find that to achieve a given accuracy, our framework requires two to five times fewer measurements than grid sampling strategies. Finally, we use the framework to evaluate the two deployments and study the average size and location of their coverage holes as well as the impact of client association policies on load-balancing.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
P. Bernardin, M. F. Yee, and T. Ellis. Cell radius inaccuracy: a new measure of coverage reliability. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 47(4):1215--1226, November 1998.
3
 
4
S. Cherry. Wi-Fi nodes to talk amongst themselves. IEEE Spectrum Magazine, July 2006.
 
5
V. Erceg, L.J. Greenstein, S. Tjandra, S.R. Parkoff, A. Gupta, B. Kulic, A. Julius, and R. Jastrzab. An empirically-based path loss model for wireless channels in suburban environments. Proceedings of IEEE GLOBECOM, November 1998.
6
 
7
A. Goldsmith and L. Greenstein. A measurement-based model for predicting coverage areas of urban microcells. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 11(7):1013--1023, September 1993.
 
8
M. Iskander and Z. Yun. Propagation prediction models for wireless communication systems. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, 50(3):662--673, Mar 2002.
 
9
 
10
M. Kamenetsky and M. Unbehaun. Coverage planning for outdoor wireless LAN systems. In International Zurich Seminar on Broadband Communications, Zurich, Switz., February 2002.
 
11
S.-C. Kim, B. J. Guarino Jr., T. M. Willis III, V. Erceg, S. J. Fortune, R. A. Valenzuela, L. W. Thomas, J. Ling, and J. D. Moore. Radio propagation measurements and prediction using three-dimensional ray tracing in urban environments at 908 MHz and 1.9 GHz. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 48(3):931--946, May 1999.
 
12
13
 
14
M. Lott and I. Forkel. A multi-wall-and-floor model for indoor radio propagation. Proceedings of IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, 1:464--468, 2001.
 
15
K. Manoj, P. Bernardin, and L. Tamil. Coverage prediction for cellular networks from limited signal strength measurements. The Ninth IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications, 3:1147--1151, September 1998.
 
16
T. Okumura, E. Ohmori, and K. Fukuda. Field strength and its variability in VHF and UHF land mobile service. Review Electrical Communication Laboratory, 16(9-10):825--873, 1968.
 
17
 
18
R. Pattuelli and V. Zingarelli. Precision of the estimation of area coverage by planning tools in cellular systems. IEEE Personal Communications, 7(3):50--53, Jun 2000.
 
19
 
20
T. Rautiainen, G. Wolfle, and R. Hoppe. Verifying path loss and delay spread predictions of a 3d ray tracing propagation model in urban environment. Proceedings of IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, 4:2470--2474, 2002.
 
21
S. Zvanovec, P. Pechac, and M. Klepal. Wireless LAN networks design: Site survey or propagation modeling? Radio Engineering Prague, 12(4):42--49, 2003.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Joshua Robinson: colleagues
Ram Swaminathan: colleagues
Edward W. Knightly: colleagues