ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Sharing places: testing psychological effects of location cueing frequency and explicit vs. inferred closeness
Full text PdfPdf (438 KB)
Source ACM International Conference Proceeding Series archive
Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Human computer interaction with mobile devices and services table of contents
Amsterdam, The Netherlands
SESSION: Short papers table of contents
Pages 399-402  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-59593-952-4
Authors
Janny C. Stapel  Human-Technology Interaction group, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Yvonne A. W. de Kort  Human-Technology Interaction group, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Wijnand A. IJsselsteijn  Human-Technology Interaction group, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Sponsors
SIGMOBILE: ACM Special Interest Group on Mobility of Systems, Users, Data and Computing
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 5,   Downloads (12 Months): 74,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1409240.1409298
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Recent ethnomethodological work in context and location awareness has indicated that location cues hold many socially meaningful cues for interaction. Location-aware technologies are therefore expected to bring about a shift in social life. Yet little is known about underlying psychological effects and the role of specific design decisions. The present research aims to experimentally test some of these effects. In a laboratory experiment participants' location in a virtual game world was shared. The effects of location Cueing frequency and Cueing mode (explicit or inferred closeness) on affinity, social presence, awareness, and game experience were explored. Higher cue frequencies resulted in higher perceived challenge and flow experienced in the game. The data also showed trends of heightened awareness and more behavioural engagement. A trend towards more psychological involvement was found when cues explicitly communicated that players shared a location in the game.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Aiello, J. R. 1987. Human spatial behavior. In D. Stokols & I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of Environmental Psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 505--531). New York: Wiley Interscience.
 
2
Argyle, M., & Dean, J. 1965. Eye contact, distance, and affiliation. Sociometry, 28, 289--304.
 
3
 
4
Byrne, D. E. 1971. The Attraction Paradigm. New York: Academic Pres.
 
5
Couch, C. J. 1970. Dimensions of association in collective behavior episodes, Sociometry, 33, 457--471.
 
6
Duckham, M. & Kulik, L. 2005. A formal model of obfuscation and negotiation for location privacy. PERVASIVE 2005, 152--170.
7
 
8
Harms, C., & Biocca, F. 2004. Internal consistency and reliability of the networked minds social presence measure. In M. Alcaniz & B.Rey (Eds.), 7th Annual International Workshop: Presence 2004.
 
9
IJsselsteijn, W. A., de Kort, Y. A. W. & Poels, K. 2008. The Game Experience Questionnaire: Development of a self-report measure to assess the psychological impact of digital games. Manuscript in preparation.
 
10
 
11
de Kort, Y. A. W., & IJsselsteijn, W. A. 2007. On sociospatial context and social interaction. D2.1.1 Literature survey on socio-spatial context and so-cial interaction. EU FP6 PASION deliverable.
 
12
de Kort, Y. A. W., IJsselsteijn, W. A., & Poels, K. 2007. Digital games as social presence technology: Development of the social presence in gaming questionnaire (SPGQ). In PRESENCE 2007, 195--203. Barcelona: Starlab.
 
13
McCroskey, J. C., & McCain, T. A., 1974. The measurement of interpersonal attraction. Speech Monographs, 41, 261--266.
 
14
Michilini, R. L., Passalacque, R., & Cusimano, J. 1976. Effects of seating arrangement on group participation. Journal of Social Psychology, 99, 179--186.
 
15
Moreland, R. L., & Beach, S. R. 1990. Exposure effects in the classroom: the development of affinity among students. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 255--276.
 
16
 
17
Priest, R. F., & Sawyer, J. 1967. Proximity and peership: bases of balance in interpersonal attraction, The American Journal of Sociology, 72, 633--649.
 
18

Collaborative Colleagues:
Janny C. Stapel: colleagues
Yvonne A. W. de Kort: colleagues
Wijnand A. IJsselsteijn: colleagues