ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Evaluation of picture browsing using a projector phone
Full text PdfPdf (1.23 MB)
Source ACM International Conference Proceeding Series archive
Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Human computer interaction with mobile devices and services table of contents
Amsterdam, The Netherlands
SESSION: Short papers table of contents
Pages 351-354  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-59593-952-4
Authors
Andrew Greaves  Lancaster University, UK
Enrico Rukzio  Lancaster University, UK
Sponsors
SIGMOBILE: ACM Special Interest Group on Mobility of Systems, Users, Data and Computing
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 18,   Downloads (12 Months): 102,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1409240.1409286
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

It is expected that projector phones (mobile phones with an integrated pico projector) will hit the market in the next few years. So far no research exists regarding how mobile applications should be designed when using a projection and which applications will profit from such a large high-resolution display. This paper presents a comparative evaluation of picture browsing using projector phones. In a study we compared three different interaction techniques: phone display only, projection only and a combination of both. The results show that users prefer the projection-based interaction techniques and the large high-resolution projection leads to a reduced number of enlarge interactions. However, the task completion time results illustrate how familiar users are in using conventional phones with small screen size. The paper presents a comprehensive discussion of findings from our study and defines important guidelines which we consider as critical for the success of applications for projector phones in the future.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Microvision. SHOW Pico Projector Prototype. http://www.microvision.com/pdfs/show_specs.pdf
 
2
Madden, D. CES 2008: DLP shows off working Pico projector prototype. 7.1.2008. http://www.pocketlint.co.uk/news/news.phtml/12082/13106/pico-projector-prototype-shown-off.phtml
 
3
Meyer, D. Mobile-friendly projector debuts at CES. 7.1.2008. http://news.zdnet.co.uk/communications/0,1000000085,39291949,00.htm
 
4
3M Mobile Projection Technology http://www.3m.com/mpro/index.html
5
 
6
7
 
8
Patel, D., Marsden, G., Jones, S., Jones, M. An Evaluation of Techniques for Browsing Photograph Collections on Small Displays. Mobile HCI 2004, Glasgow, Scotland.
 
9
Liu, H., Xie, X., Ma. W,-Y., Zhang, H,-J. Automatic Browsing of Large Pictures on Mobile Devices. Nordic Mobile Media 2003, Berkeley, California, USA.
 
10
Intrusion Warning over mini projectors. February 26 2008. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7265365.stm

Collaborative Colleagues:
Andrew Greaves: colleagues
Enrico Rukzio: colleagues