| Evaluation of picture browsing using a projector phone |
| Full text |
Pdf
(1.23 MB)
|
| Source
|
ACM International Conference Proceeding Series
archive
Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Human computer interaction with mobile devices and services
table of contents
Amsterdam, The Netherlands
SESSION: Short papers
table of contents
Pages 351-354
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-59593-952-4
|
|
Authors
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 18, Downloads (12 Months): 102, Citation Count: 0
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
It is expected that projector phones (mobile phones with an integrated pico projector) will hit the market in the next few years. So far no research exists regarding how mobile applications should be designed when using a projection and which applications will profit from such a large high-resolution display. This paper presents a comparative evaluation of picture browsing using projector phones. In a study we compared three different interaction techniques: phone display only, projection only and a combination of both. The results show that users prefer the projection-based interaction techniques and the large high-resolution projection leads to a reduced number of enlarge interactions. However, the task completion time results illustrate how familiar users are in using conventional phones with small screen size. The paper presents a comprehensive discussion of findings from our study and defines important guidelines which we consider as critical for the success of applications for projector phones in the future.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
Microvision. SHOW Pico Projector Prototype. http://www.microvision.com/pdfs/show_specs.pdf
|
| |
2
|
Madden, D. CES 2008: DLP shows off working Pico projector prototype. 7.1.2008. http://www.pocketlint.co.uk/news/news.phtml/12082/13106/pico-projector-prototype-shown-off.phtml
|
| |
3
|
Meyer, D. Mobile-friendly projector debuts at CES. 7.1.2008. http://news.zdnet.co.uk/communications/0,1000000085,39291949,00.htm
|
| |
4
|
3M Mobile Projection Technology http://www.3m.com/mpro/index.html
|
 |
5
|
Ramesh Raskar , Jeroen van Baar , Paul Beardsley , Thomas Willwacher , Srinivas Rao , Clifton Forlines, iLamps: geometrically aware and self-configuring projectors, ACM SIGGRAPH 2005 Courses, July 31-August 04, 2005, Los Angeles, California
[doi> 10.1145/1198555.1198715]
|
| |
6
|
|
 |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
Patel, D., Marsden, G., Jones, S., Jones, M. An Evaluation of Techniques for Browsing Photograph Collections on Small Displays. Mobile HCI 2004, Glasgow, Scotland.
|
| |
9
|
Liu, H., Xie, X., Ma. W,-Y., Zhang, H,-J. Automatic Browsing of Large Pictures on Mobile Devices. Nordic Mobile Media 2003, Berkeley, California, USA.
|
| |
10
|
Intrusion Warning over mini projectors. February 26 2008. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7265365.stm
|
INDEX TERMS
Primary Classification:
H.
Information Systems
H.5
INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
H.5.2
User Interfaces (D.2.2, H.1.2, I.3.6)
Subjects:
Input devices and strategies (e.g., mouse, touchscreen)
Additional Classification:
H.
Information Systems
H.5
INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
H.5.2
User Interfaces (D.2.2, H.1.2, I.3.6)
Subjects:
Prototyping
General Terms:
Design,
Experimentation,
Human Factors,
Measurement
Keywords:
interaction design,
photo browsing,
projector phone
|