ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Evaluating assistance of natural language policy authoring
Full text PdfPdf (324 KB)
Source
ACM International Conference Proceeding Series; Vol. 337 archive
Proceedings of the 4th symposium on Usable privacy and security table of contents
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
SESSION: Configuration and policies table of contents
Pages 65-73  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-276-4
Authors
Kami Vaniea  Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
Clare-Marie Karat  IBM T.J. Watson Research, Hawthorne, NY
Joshua B. Gross  The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA
John Karat  IBM T.J. Watson Research, Hawthorne, NY
Carolyn Brodie  IBM T.J. Watson Research, Hawthorne, NY
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 10,   Downloads (12 Months): 66,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1408664.1408674
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The goal of the research study reported here was to investigate policy authors' ability to take descriptions of changes to policy situations and author high-quality, complete policy rules that would parse with high accuracy. As a part of this research, we investigated ways in which we could assist policy authors in writing policies. This paper presents the results of a user study on the effectiveness of providing syntax highlighting in a natural language policy authoring interface. While subjects liked the new interface, they showed no improvement in accuracy when writing rules. We discuss our results in terms of a three phase authoring process that users move through when authoring or modifying policies. We describe this process, discuss why and how our interface failed to support it and make recommendations to designers on how to better support this process.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Alamargot, D. and Chanquoy, L., Through the Models of Writing. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2001.
 
2
 
3
Breaux, T. D., and Anton, A. I. Analyzing Goal Semantics for Rights, Permissions, and Obligations. Technical Report #TR-2005-08, North Carolina State University, Department of Computer Science, February 15, 2005.
4
5
6
 
7
Hayes, J. R. and Flower, L. S. Identifying the organization of writing processes. In L. W. Gregg, and E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 3--30). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1980.
 
8
Holtzblatt, K. and Beyer, H., Contextual Design. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco. 1998.
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
13
 
14
Reeder, R., Karat, C., Karat, J. and Brodie, C., Usability challenges in security and privacy policy-authoring interfaces. INTERACT, 2007.
 
15
16

Collaborative Colleagues:
Kami Vaniea: colleagues
Clare-Marie Karat: colleagues
Joshua B. Gross: colleagues
John Karat: colleagues
Carolyn Brodie: colleagues