|
ABSTRACT
One common practice in relation to alphanumeric passwords is to write them down or share them with a trusted friend or colleague. Graphical password schemes often claim the advantage that they are significantly more secure with respect to both verbal disclosure and writing down. We investigated the reality of this claim in relation to the Passfaces graphical password scheme. By collecting a corpus of naturalistic descriptions of a set of 45 faces, we explored participants' ability to associate descriptions with faces across three conditions in which the decoy faces were selected: (1) at random; (2) on the basis of their visual similarity to the target face; and (3) on the basis of the similarity of the verbal descriptions of the decoy faces to the target face. Participants were found to perform significantly worse when presented with visual and verbally grouped decoys, suggesting that Passfaces can be further secured for description. Subtle differences in both the nature of male and female descriptions, and male and female performance were also observed.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
 |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
G. Blonder. United States Patent 5559961, Graphical Passwords, 1996.
|
| |
3
|
S. Brostoff and A. Sasse. Are Passfaces more usable than passwords? A field trial investigation. In HCI 2000: Proceedings of People and Computers XIV - Usability or Else, pages 405--424. Springer, 2000.
|
| |
4
|
Sonia Chiasson , P. C. van Oorschot , Robert Biddle, A usability study and critique of two password managers, Proceedings of the 15th conference on USENIX Security Symposium, p.1, July 31-August 04, 2006, Vancouver, B.C., Canada
|
| |
5
|
J. Davies. Visual Code Recordal and Communication Thereof International Patent PCT/GB1999/001688, 1999.
|
| |
6
|
|
| |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
A. De Angeli, L. Coventry, G. Johnson, and M. Coutts. Usability and user authentication: Pictorial passwords vs. pin. In McCabe, P. T. (Ed.), Contemporary Ergonomics 2003., pages 253--258. Taylor & Francis. London, 2003.
|
| |
9
|
|
 |
10
|
|
| |
11
|
D. M. Horgan. Language development. University of Michigan doctoral dissertation, 1975.
|
 |
12
|
|
| |
13
|
D. F. Halpern. Sex Differences in Cognitive Abilities. Lawrence Erlbaum, 3 edition, 2000.
|
| |
14
|
J. Huttenlocher, W. Haight, A. Bryk, M. Seltzer, and T. Lyons. Early Vocabulary growth:Relation to Language Input and Gender. In Developmental Psychology, volume 27, pages 236--248.
|
| |
15
|
Ian Jermyn , Alain Mayer , Fabian Monrose , Michael K. Reiter , Aviel D. Rubin, The design and analysis of graphical passwords, Proceedings of the 8th conference on USENIX Security Symposium, p.1-1, August 23-26, 1999, Washington, D.C.
|
| |
16
|
|
 |
17
|
|
| |
18
|
Passfaces Corporation. The Science Behind Passfaces.
|
| |
19
|
Passfaces Corporation: http://www.passfaces.com.
|
| |
20
|
|
| |
21
|
SearchSecurity.com - http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/news/article/0,289142,sid14_gci895483,00.html. Employees willing to share passwords with strangers (2003) last accessed 23/02/2008.
|
| |
22
|
Searchsecurity.com - http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/news/article/0,289142,sid14_ gci902867,00.html. Most workers must remember 6 passwords or more (2003) last accessed 23/02/2008.
|
| |
23
|
|
| |
24
|
|
| |
25
|
|
| |
26
|
T. Valentine. An Evaluation of the Passface Personal Authentication System. Technical Report. London: Goldmsiths College University of London., 1998.
|
| |
27
|
T. Valentine. Memory for Passfaces after a long delay. Technical Report. London: Goldmsiths College University of London., 1998.
|
| |
28
|
|
| |
29
|
|
| |
30
|
|
| |
31
|
M. Zviran and W. J. Haga. A comparison of password techniques for multilevel authentication mechanisms. The Computer Journal, 3(3), 1993.
|
CITED BY
|
|
Katherine M. Everitt , Tanya Bragin , James Fogarty , Tadayoshi Kohno, A comprehensive study of frequency, interference, and training of multiple graphical passwords, Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Human factors in computing systems, April 04-09, 2009, Boston, MA, USA
|
|