Agility in virtualized utility computing

ABSTRACT

Virtual machines have emerged as an attractive approach for utility computing platforms because applications running on VMs are fault- and security- isolated from each other, yet can share physical machines. An important property of a virtualized utility computing platform is how quickly it can react to changing demand. We refer to the capability of a utility computing platform to quickly reassign resources as the agility of the platform. We are targeting hosting utility provider environments where the entire platform is under the control of a single administrative domain and application instances often form application-level clusters. In this work, we examine resource reassignment mechanisms in these environments from the agility perspective and outline a new mechanism that exploits properties of a virtualized utility computing platform.

This new mechanism employs ghost virtual machines (VMs), which participate in application clusters, but do not handle client requests until activated by the resource management system. We evaluate this, as well as other, mechanisms on a utility computing testbed. The results show that this ghost VM approach is superior to other approaches in its agility, and allows a new VM to be added to an existing application cluster in a few seconds with negligible overhead. This is a promising result as we develop resource management algorithms for a globally distributed utility computing platform.

REFERENCES

• 1: A. Andrzejak, M. Arlitt, and J. Rolia. Bounding the resource savings of utility computing models. Technical Report HPL-2002-339, HP Labs, December 2002.
• 2: BEA WebLogic Server. http://www.bea.com/framework.jsp?CNT=in-dex.htm&FP=/content/products/weblogic/server/.
• 3: Xuan Chen and John Heidemann. Experimental evaluation of an adaptive flash crowd protection system. Technical Report ISI-TR-2003-573, USC/ISI, July 2003.
• 4: Christopher Clark , Keir Fraser , Steven Hand , Jacob Gorm Hansen , Eric Jul , Christian Limpach , Ian Pratt , Andrew Warfield, Live migration of virtual machines, Proceedings of the 2nd conference on Symposium on Networked Systems Design & Implementation, p.273-286, May 02-04, 2005
• 5: Renato J. Figueiredo , Peter A. Dinda , José A. B. Fortes, A Case For Grid Computing On Virtual Machines, Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, p.550, May 19-22, 2003
• 6: Tobias Groothuyse , Swaminathan Sivasubramanian , Guillaume Pierre, Globetp: template-based database replication for scalable web applications, Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web, May 08-12, 2007, Banff, Alberta, Canada [doi>10.1145/1242572.1242614]
• 7: Diwaker Gupta, Ludmila Cherkasova, Rob Gardner, and Amin Vahdat. Enforcing performance isolation across virtual machines in Xen. In Proceedings of the ACM/IFIP/USENIX 7th International Middleware Conference, November 2006.
• 8: Ravi Iyer , Li Zhao , Fei Guo , Ramesh Illikkal , Srihari Makineni , Don Newell , Yan Solihin , Lisa Hsu , Steve Reinhardt, QoS policies and architecture for cache/memory in CMP platforms, Proceedings of the 2007 ACM SIGMETRICS international conference on Measurement and modeling of computer systems, June 12-16, 2007, San Diego, California, USA
• 9: JBoss application server. http://www.jboss.org/products/jbossas.
• 10: Xuxian Jiang , Dongyan Xu, SODA: A Service-On-Demand Architecture for Application Service Hosting Utility Platforms, Proceedings of the 12th IEEE International Symposium on High Performance Distributed Computing, p.174, June 22-24, 2003
• 11: Jaeyeon Jung , Balachander Krishnamurthy , Michael Rabinovich, Flash crowds and denial of service attacks: characterization and implications for CDNs and web sites, Proceedings of the 11th international conference on World Wide Web, May 07-11, 2002, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA [doi>10.1145/511446.511485]
• 12: Ivan Krsul , Arijit Ganguly , Jian Zhang , Jose A. B. Fortes , Renato J. Figueiredo, VMPlants: Providing and Managing Virtual Machine Execution Environments for Grid Computing, Proceedings of the 2004 ACM/IEEE conference on Supercomputing, p.7, November 06-12, 2004 [doi>10.1109/SC.2004.67]
• 13: David Mosberger and Tai Jin. httperf -- a tool for measuring web server performance. In Workshop on Internet Server Performance, Madison, Wisconsin USA, June 1998.
• 14: Oracle application server. http://www.oracle.com/appserver/index.html.
• 15: Pradeep Padala , Kang G. Shin , Xiaoyun Zhu , Mustafa Uysal , Zhikui Wang , Sharad Singhal , Arif Merchant , Kenneth Salem, Adaptive control of virtualized resources in utility computing environments, Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGOPS/EuroSys European Conference on Computer Systems 2007, March 21-23, 2007, Lisbon, Portugal
• 16: Performance characteristics of virtualized systems with the vmware esx server and sizing methodology for consolidating servers. IBM White Paper. ibm.com/websphere/developer/zones/hipods, April 2007.
• 17: Ananth I. Sundararaj , Peter A. Dinda, Towards virtual networks for virtual machine grid computing, Proceedings of the 3rd conference on Virtual Machine Research And Technology Symposium, p.14-14, May 06-07, 2004, San Jose, California
• 18: Websphere application server. http://www-306.ibm.com/software/webservers/appserv/was/.
• 19: Andrew Whitaker , Marianne Shaw , Steven D. Gribble, Scale and performance in the Denali isolation kernel, Proceedings of the 5th symposium on Operating systems design and implementation

  Due to copyright restrictions we are not able to make the PDFs for this conference available for downloading

  , December 09-11, 2002, Boston, Massachusetts [doi>10.1145/1060289.1060308]
• 20: Timothy Wood, Prashant Shenoy, Arun Venkataramani, and Mazin Yousif. Black-box and gray-box strategies for virtual machine migration. In USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation, Cambridge, MA, USA, April 2007.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  C. Computer Systems Organization
  C.5 COMPUTER SYSTEM IMPLEMENTATION

General Terms:
Experimentation, Measurement, Performance

Keywords:
agility, utility computing, virtualization