ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A dynamic decision network framework for online media adaptation in stroke rehabilitation
Full text PdfPdf (15.14 MB)
Source
ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications (TOMCCAP) archive
Volume 5 ,  Issue 1  (October 2008) table of contents
Article No. 4  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISSN:1551-6857
Authors
Yinpeng Chen  Arizona State University
Weiwei Xu  Arizona State University
Hari Sundaram  Arizona State University
Thanassis Rikakis  Arizona State University
Sheng-Min Liu  Arizona State University
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 15,   Downloads (12 Months): 142,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1404880.1404884
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In this article, we present a media adaptation framework for an immersive biofeedback system for stroke patient rehabilitation. In our biofeedback system, media adaptation refers to changes in audio/visual feedback as well as changes in physical environment. Effective media adaptation frameworks help patients recover generative plans for arm movement with potential for significantly shortened therapeutic time. The media adaptation problem has significant challenges—(a) high dimensionality of adaptation parameter space; (b) variability in the patient performance across and within sessions; (c) the actual rehabilitation plan is typically a non-first-order Markov process, making the learning task hard.

Our key insight is to understand media adaptation as a real-time feedback control problem. We use a mixture-of-experts based Dynamic Decision Network (DDN) for online media adaptation. We train DDN mixtures per patient, per session. The mixture models address two basic questions—(a) given a specific adaptation suggested by the domain experts, predict the patient performance, and (b) given the expected performance, determine the optimal adaptation decision. The questions are answered through an optimality criterion based search on DDN models trained in previous sessions. We have also developed new validation metrics and have very good results for both questions on actual stroke rehabilitation data.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
Brooks, R. A. 1991a. Intelligence Without Reason. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Articial Intelligence. 569--595.
 
3
 
4
 
5
Bui, H. 2003. A general model for online probabilistic plan recognition. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
 
6
Burridge, R. R., Rizzi, A. A., and Koditschek, D. E. 1999. Sequential composition of dynamically dexterous robot behaviors. Int. J. Robot. Resear. 18, 6, 534--555.
7
8
 
9
Darwiche, A. 2001. Constant space reasoning in Dynamic Bayesian Networks. Intl. J. of Approximate Reasoning 26, 161--178.
 
10
Dempster, A., Laird, N., and Rubin, D. 1977. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J. Royal Statist. Soc. 39, 1, 1--38.
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
Gallichio, J. and Kluding, P. 2004. Virtual reality in stroke rehabilitation: Review of the emerging research. Phys. Therapy Rev. 9, 4, 207--212.
 
15
Grout, D. J. and Palisca, C. V. 2001. A History of Western Music. Norton, New York.
 
16
Grupen, R. A. and Coelho, J. J. A. 2002. Acquiring state from control dynamics to learn grasping policies for robot hands. Advanced Robotics 16, 5, 427--443.
 
17
He, X., Ma, W.-Y., King, O., Li, M., and Zhang, H. 2003. Learning and inferring a semantic space from user's relevance feedback for image retrieval. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. Video Tech.
 
18
Holden, M. and Dyar, T. 2002. Virtual environment training: A new tool for neurorehabilitation. Neurology Rep. 26, 62--72.
 
19
Holden, M., Todorov, E., Callahan, J., and Bizzi, E. 1999. Virtual environment training imporves motor performance in two patients with stroke: Case report. Neurology Rep. 23, 57--67.
20
 
21
Hsiao, K., Kaelbling, L. P., and Lozano-Perez, T. 2007. Grasping POMDPs. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation.
 
22
Huber, P. J. 1981. Robust Statistics. Wiley.
 
23
Hutchins, E. 1995. Cognition in the Wild. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
24
25
 
26
Jack, D., Boian, R., Merians, A. S., Tremaine, M., Burdea, G. C., Adamovich, S. V., Recce, M., and Poizner, H. 2001. Virtual reality-enhanced stroke rehabilitation. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabi. Eng. 9, 308--318.
 
27
 
28
 
29
Kjaerulff, U. 1995. dHugin: A computational system for dynamic time-sliced Bayesian networks. Intl. J. Forecasting 11, 89--111.
 
30
 
31
 
32
Liao, L., Fox, D., and Kautz, H. 2004. Learning and inferring transportation routines. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
33
34
 
35
Merians, A. S., Jack, D., Boian, R., Tremaine, M., Burdea, G. C., Adamovich, S. V., Recce, M., and Poizner, H. 2002. Virtual reality-augmented rehabilittion for patients following stroke. Phys. Ther. 82, 9, 898--915.
 
36
 
37
Murphy, K., Torralba, A., and Freeman, W. 2003. Using the forest to see the trees: A graphical model relating features, objects and scenes. In Proceedings of the NIPS'03 (Neural Info. Processing Systems).
 
38
Pineau, J., Gordon, G., and Thrun, S. 2003. Point-based value iteration: An anytime algorithm for pomdps. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
 
39
Rabiner, L. R. 1989. A tutorial on hidden markov models and selected applications in speech recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE 77, 2, 257--286.
 
40
 
41
Simmons, R. and Koenig, S. 1995. Probabilistic robot navigation in partially observable environments. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
 
42
 
43
Spaan, M. T. J. and Vlassis, N. 2005. Perseus: Randomized point-based value iteration for pomdps. J. Artifi. Intell. Resear. 24, 195--220.
44
45
 
46
Sundaram, H. and Rikakis, T. 2006. Experiential Media Systems. Encyclopedia of Multimedia. B. Furtht. Springer Verlag, NY.
 
47
Theocharous, G. and Kaelbling, L. P. 2004. Approximate planning in POMDPs with macro-actions. Advances in Neural Information Prodessing Systems 16, Vancouver.
 
48
Theocharous, G., Murphy, K., and Kaelbling, L. P. 2004. Representing hierarchical POMDPs as DBNs for multi-scale robot localization. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Robotics and Automation.
 
49
50
 
51
White, D., Burdick, K., Fulk, G., Searleman, J. and Carroll, J. 2005. A virtual reality application for stroke patient rehabilitation. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics & Automation Niagara Falls, Canada.
 
52
53

Collaborative Colleagues:
Yinpeng Chen: colleagues
Weiwei Xu: colleagues
Hari Sundaram: colleagues
Thanassis Rikakis: colleagues
Sheng-Min Liu: colleagues