| A formal approach to the protocol converter problem |
| Full text |
Pdf
(261 KB)
|
| Source
|
Design, Automation, and Test in Europe
archive
Proceedings of the conference on Design, automation and test in Europe
table of contents
Munich, Germany
SESSION: System synthesis
table of contents
Pages 294-299
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-3-9810801-3-1
|
|
Authors
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 5, Downloads (12 Months): 35, Citation Count: 1
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
In the absence of a single module interface standard, integration of pre-designed modules in System-on-Chip design often requires the use of protocol converters. Existing approaches to automatic synthesis of protocol converters mostly lack formal foundations and either employ abstractions that ignore crucial low level behaviors, or grossly simplify the structure of the protocols considered. We present a state-machine based formal model for bus based communication protocols, and precisely define protocol compatibility, and correct protocol conversion. Our model is expressive enough to capture features of commercial protocols such as bursts, pipelined transfers, wait state insertion, and data persistence, in cycle accurate detail. We show that the most general, correct converter for a pair of protocols, can be described as the greatest fixed point of a function for updating buffer states. This characterization yields a natural algorithm for automatic synthesis of a provably correct converter by iterative computation of the fixed point. We report our experience with automatic converter synthesis between widely used commercial bus protocols, such as AMBA AHB, ASB, APB, and OCP, considering features which are beyond the scope of current techniques.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
Open core protocol international partnership, http://www.ocpip.org.
|
| |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
V. Androutsopoulos, D. Brookes, and T. Clarke. Protocol converter synthesis. Computers and Digital Techniques, 151(6):391--401, 2004.
|
| |
4
|
ARM. Amba specification, http://www.arm.com/.
|
| |
5
|
K. Avnit, V. D'Silva, A. Sowmya, S. Ramesh, and S. Parameswaran. Protocol compatibility and automatic converter synthesis. Technical Report 0718, UNSW, Australia, August 2007.
|
| |
6
|
|
| |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
D. Gajski, H. Cho, and S. Abdi. General transducer architecture. Technical Report TR 05--08, CECS Center for Embedded Computer Systems University of California, Irvine, August 2005.
|
 |
9
|
|
 |
10
|
Roberto Passerone , Luca de Alfaro , Thomas A. Henzinger , Alberto L. Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, Convertibility verification and converter synthesis: two faces of the same coin, Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE/ACM international conference on Computer-aided design, p.132-139, November 10-14, 2002, San Jose, California
[doi> 10.1145/774572.774592]
|
 |
11
|
Roberto Passerone , James A. Rowson , Alberto Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, Automatic synthesis of interfaces between incompatible protocols, Proceedings of the 35th annual conference on Design automation, p.8-13, June 15-19, 1998, San Francisco, California, United States
[doi> 10.1145/277044.277047]
|
 |
12
|
|
| |
13
|
|
|