ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Spamming botnets: signatures and characteristics
Full text PdfPdf (753 KB)
Source
Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communication archive
Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2008 conference on Data communication table of contents
Seattle, WA, USA
SESSION: Security I table of contents
Pages 171-182  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-175-0
Also published in ...
Authors
Yinglian Xie  Microsoft Research, Silicon Valley, Mountain View, CA, USA
Fang Yu  Microsoft Research, Silicon Valley, Mountain View, CA, USA
Kannan Achan  Microsoft Research, Silicon Valley, Mountain View, CA, USA
Rina Panigrahy  Microsoft Research, Silicon Valley, Mountain View, CA, USA
Geoff Hulten  Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA
Ivan Osipkov  Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGCOMM: ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 72,   Downloads (12 Months): 591,   Citation Count: 5
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1402958.1402979
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we focus on characterizing spamming botnets by leveraging both spam payload and spam server traffic properties. Towards this goal, we developed a spam signature generation framework called AutoRE to detect botnet-based spam emails and botnet membership. AutoRE does not require pre-classified training data or white lists. Moreover, it outputs high quality regular expression signatures that can detect botnet spam with a low false positive rate. Using a three-month sample of emails from Hotmail, AutoRE successfully identified 7,721 botnet-based spam campaigns together with 340,050 unique botnet host IP addresses.

Our in-depth analysis of the identified botnets revealed several interesting findings regarding the degree of email obfuscation, properties of botnet IP addresses, sending patterns, and their correlation with network scanning traffic. We believe these observations are useful information in the design of botnet detection schemes.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
D. Dagon, C. Zou, and W. Lee. Modeling botnet propagation using time zones. In Proc. of the 13th Annual Network and Distributed System Security Symposium (NDSS), 2006.
 
6
 
7
Dshield: Cooperative network security community. Dynablock dynamic IP list. http://www.njabl.org/, recently aquired by spamhaus, http://www.spamhaus.org/pbl/index.lasso, 2007.
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
C. Kreibich and J. Crowcroft. Honeycomb: Creating intrusion detection signatures using honeypots. In 2nd Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks (HotNets-II), 2003.
 
13
F. Li and M.-H. Hsieh. An empirical study of clustering behavior of spammers and group-based anti-spam strategies. In CEAS 2006: Proceedings of the 3rd conference on email and anti-spam, 2006.
 
14
 
15
16
 
17
A. Ramachandran, D. Dagon, and N. Feamster. Can DNS based blacklists keep up with bots? In Conference on Email and Anti-Spam, 2006.
18
19
 
20
 
21
Spamhaus policy block list (PBL). http://www.spamhaus.org/pbl/, Jan 2007.
 
22
S. Webb, J. Caverlee, and C. Pu. Introducing the web spam corpus: Using email spam to identify web spam automatically. In Proceedings of the Third Conference on Email and Anti-Spam (CEAS), 2006.
23
 
24


Collaborative Colleagues:
Yinglian Xie: colleagues
Fang Yu: colleagues
Kannan Achan: colleagues
Rina Panigrahy: colleagues
Geoff Hulten: colleagues
Ivan Osipkov: colleagues