ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Xl: an efficient network routing algorithm
Full text PdfPdf (272 KB)
Source
Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communication archive
Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2008 conference on Data communication table of contents
Seattle, WA, USA
SESSION: Routing table of contents
Pages 15-26  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-175-0
Also published in ...
Authors
Kirill Levchenko  University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
Geoffrey M. Voelker  University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
Ramamohan Paturi  University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
Stefan Savage  University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGCOMM: ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 26,   Downloads (12 Months): 305,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1402958.1402962
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we present a new link-state routing algorithm called Approximate Link state (XL) aimed at increasing routing efficiency by suppressing updates from parts of the network. We prove that three simple criteria for update propagation are sufficient to guarantee soundness, completeness and bounded optimality for any such algorithm. We show, via simulation, that XL significantly outperforms standard link-state and distance vector algorithms - in some cases reducing overhead by more than an order of magnitude - while having negligible impact on path length. Finally, we argue that existing link-state protocols, such as OSPF, can incorporate XL routing in a backwards compatible and incrementally deployable fashion.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Abilene interior-routing metrics. http://noc.net.internet2.edu, March 2006.
2
3
4
 
5
Cisco Systems. Introduction to EIGRP. Document ID 13669.
 
6
Cisco Systems. OSPF Design Guide. Document ID 7039.
 
7
 
8
V. Fayet, D. A. Khotimsky, and T. Przygienda. Hop-by-hop routing with node-dependent topology information. In Proceedings of The Eighteenth INFOCOM Conference, pages 79--87, 1999.
 
9
D. Fedyk and P. Bottorff. Provider link state bridging (PLSB). IEEE Draft, 2007.
 
10
 
11
F. E. Heart, A. McKenzie, J. M. McQuillan, and D. C. Walden. ARPANET completion report. Technical Report 4799, Bolt, Baranek and Newman, 1978.
 
12
P. A. Humblet. Another adaptive distributed shortest path algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 39(6):995--1003, June 1991.
13
 
14
IEEE 802.11s draft standard, 2007.
 
15
K. Ishiguro, V. Manral, A. Davey, and A. Lindem. Traffic engineering extensions to OSPF version 3. IETF Draft, 2007.
 
16
A. Iwata, C.-C. Chiang, G. Pei, M. Gerla, and T.-W. Chen. Scalable routing strategies for ad hoc wireless networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communication, 17(8):1369--1379, August 1999.
 
17
J. M. Jaffe and F. H. Moss. A responsive distributed routing algorithm for computer networks. IEEE Transactions on Communications, COM-30(7):1758--1762, July 1982.
18
19
 
20
G. Malkin. RFC 2453: RIP version 2, 1998.
 
21
J. M. McQuillan, G. Falk, and I. Richer. A review of the development and performance of the ARPANET routing algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Communications, COM-26(12):1802--1811, Dec 1978.
 
22
J. M. McQuillan, I. Richer, and E. C. Rosen. The new routing algorithm for the ARPANET. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 28(5):711--719, May 1980.
 
23
P. M. Merlin and A. Segall. A failsafe distributed routing protocol. IEEE Transactions on Communications, COM-27(9):1280--1287, September 1979.
 
24
J. Moy. RFC 2328: OSPF version 2, 1998.
 
25
 
26
 
27
P. Pillay-Esnault. OSPF Refresh and Flooding Reduction in Stable Topologies. RFC 4136, 2005.
28
 
29
S. B. Seidman. Network structure and minimum degree. Social Networks, 5(3):269--287, September 1983.
30
 
31
M. Thorup. OSPF Areas Considered Harmful. Private paper, Apr 2003.
 
32
A. Zinin and M. Shand. Flooding Optimizations in Link-state Routing Protocols. IETF Draft, 2000.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Kirill Levchenko: colleagues
Geoffrey M. Voelker: colleagues
Ramamohan Paturi: colleagues
Stefan Savage: colleagues