ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Structure in threes: modelling organization-oriented software architectures built upon multi-agent systems
Full text PdfPdf (102 KB)
Source
International Conference on Autonomous Agents archive
Proceedings of the 7th international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems - Volume 3 table of contents
Estoril, Portugal
SESSION: Agent-based system development table of contents
Pages 1307-1310  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-0-9817381-2-X
Authors
Matthias Wester-Ebbinghaus  University of Hamburg, Hamburg
Daniel Moldt  University of Hamburg, Hamburg
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
AAAI : Association for the Advancement of Artifical Intelligence
Publisher
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 50,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  

ABSTRACT

Software systems are subject to increasing complexity and in need of efficient structuring. Multi-agent system research has come up with approaches for an organization-oriented comprehension of software systems. However, when it comes to the collective level of organizational analysis, multi-agent system technology lacks clear development concepts. To overcome this problem while preserving the earnings of the agent-oriented approach, this paper propagates a shift in perspective from the individual agent to the organization as the core metaphor of software engineering targeting at very large systems. According to different levels of analysis drawn from organization theory, different types of organizational units are incorporated into a reference architecture for organization-oriented software systems.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
O. Boissier, J. Hübner, and J. S. Sichman. Organization oriented programming: From closed to open systems. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Workshop on Engineering Societies in the Agents World (EASW 2006), 2006.
 
2
R. Cyert and J. March. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1963.
 
3
P. DiMaggio and W. Powell. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48:147--160, 1983.
 
4
J. Ferber, O. Gutknecht, and F. Michel. From agents to organizations: an organizational view of multi-agent systems. In Agent-Oriented Software Engineering IV, 4th International Workshop, AOSE 2003, volume 2935 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer Verlag, 2003.
 
5
 
6
 
7
O. Kummer. Referenznetze. Logos Verlag, Berlin, 2002.
 
8
H. Mintzberg. Structure in Fives: Designing Effective Organizations. Prentice-Hall, 1983.
 
9
L. Pondy and I. Mitroff. Beyond open system models of organization. In Research in Organizational Behaviour, volume 1, pages 3--39. CT: JAI Press, 1979.
 
10
W. R. Scott. Organizations: Rational, Natural and Open Systems. Prentice Hall, 2003.
 
11
H. Simon. The architecture of complexity. In Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, volume 106, pages 467--482, 1962.
 
12
M. Wester-Ebbinghaus, D. Moldt, C. Reese, and K. Markwardt. Towards Organization--Oriented Software Engineering. In Software Engineering Konferenz 2007 in Hamburg: SE'07 Proceedings, volume 105 of LNI, pages 205--217. GI, 2007.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Matthias Wester-Ebbinghaus: colleagues
Daniel Moldt: colleagues