| The utility of temporal abstraction in reinforcement learning |
| Full text |
Pdf
(309 KB)
|
Source
|
International Conference on Autonomous Agents
archive
Proceedings of the 7th international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems - Volume 1
table of contents
Estoril, Portugal
SESSION: Agent and multi-agent learning
table of contents
Pages 299-306
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-0-9817381-0-9
|
|
Authors
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 7, Downloads (12 Months): 77, Citation Count: 1
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
The hierarchical structure of real-world problems has motivated extensive research into temporal abstractions for reinforcement learning, but precisely how these abstractions allow agents to improve their learning performance is not well understood. This paper investigates the connection between temporal abstraction and an agent's exploration policy, which determines how the agent's performance improves over time. Experimental results with standard methods for incorporating temporal abstractions show that these methods benefit learning only in limited contexts. The primary contribution of this paper is a clearer understanding of how hierarchical decompositions interact with reinforcement learning algorithms, with important consequences for the manual design or automatic discovery of action hierarchies.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
T. G. Dietterich. Hierarchical reinforcement learning with the MAXQ value function decomposition. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 13:227--303, 2000.
|
| |
4
|
M. Hauskrecht, N. Meuleau, L. P. Kaelbling, T. Dean, and C. Boutilier. Hierarchical solution of Markov decision processes using macro-actions. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pages 220--229, 1998.
|
| |
5
|
|
| |
6
|
|
 |
7
|
Shie Mannor , Ishai Menache , Amit Hoze , Uri Klein, Dynamic abstraction in reinforcement learning via clustering, Proceedings of the twenty-first international conference on Machine learning, p.71, July 04-08, 2004, Banff, Alberta, Canada
[doi> 10.1145/1015330.1015355]
|
| |
8
|
|
| |
9
|
|
 |
10
|
|
| |
11
|
S. Singh, A. G. Barto, and N. Chentanez. Intrinsically motivated reinforcement learning. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 17, 2005.
|
 |
12
|
Alexander L. Strehl , Lihong Li , Eric Wiewiora , John Langford , Michael L. Littman, PAC model-free reinforcement learning, Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on Machine learning, p.881-888, June 25-29, 2006, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
[doi> 10.1145/1143844.1143955]
|
| |
13
|
|
| |
14
|
|
| |
15
|
C. Watkins. Learning From Delayed Rewards. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, 1989.
|
|