ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Stochastic search methods for nash equilibrium approximation in simulation-based games
Full text PdfPdf (727 KB)
Source
International Conference on Autonomous Agents archive
Proceedings of the 7th international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems - Volume 2 table of contents
Estoril, Portugal
SESSION: Economic paradigms table of contents
Pages 1055-1062  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-0-9817381-1-6
Authors
Yevgeniy Vorobeychik  University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
Michael P. Wellman  University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
Sponsors
AAAI : Association for the Advancement of Artifical Intelligence
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 11,   Downloads (12 Months): 62,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  

ABSTRACT

We define the class of games called simulation-based games, in which the payoffs are available as an output of an oracle (simulator), rather than specified analytically or using a payoff matrix. We then describe a convergent algorithm based on a hierarchical application of simulated annealing for estimating Nash equilibria in simulation-based games with finite-dimensional strategy sets. Additionally, we present alternative algorithms for best response and Nash equilibrium estimation, with a particular focus on one-shot infinite games of incomplete information. Our experimental results demonstrate that all the approaches we introduce are efficacious, albeit some more so than others. We show, for example, that while iterative best response dynamics has relatively weak convergence guarantees, it outperforms our convergent method experimentally. Additionally, we provide considerable evidence that a method based on random search outperforms gradient descent in our setting.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
B. Blum, C. R. Shelton, and D. Koller. A continuation method for Nash equilibria in structured games. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 25:457--502, 2006.
 
2
 
3
D. Fudenberg and J. Tirole. Game Theory. MIT Press, 1991.
 
4
A. Ghate and R. L. Smith. Adaptive search with stochastic acceptance probabilities for global optimization. draft, 2006.
 
5
J. Kiefer and J. Wolfowitz. Stochastic estimation of the maximum of a regression function. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 23(3):462--466, 1952.
 
6
V. Krishna. Auction Theory. Academic Press, 1st edition, 2002.
 
7
R. D. McKelvey, A. M. McLennan, and T. L. Turocy. Gambit: Software tools for game theory, version 0.2005.06.13, 2005.
 
8
P. Milgrom and J. Roberts. Rationalizability, learning, and equilibrium in games with strategic complementarities. Econometrica, 58(6):1255--1277, 1990.
 
9
D. Monderer and L. S. Shapley. Potential games. Games and Economics Behavior, 14:124--143, 1996.
 
10
 
11
 
12
Y. Vorobeychik, D. M. Reeves, and M. P. Wellman. Constrained automated mechanism design for infinite games of incomplete information. In The Twenty-Third Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pages 400--407, 2007.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Yevgeniy Vorobeychik: colleagues
Michael P. Wellman: colleagues