ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Digital Library logoTake a look at the new version of this page: [ beta version ]. Tell us what you think.
Self-interested database managers playing the view maintenance game
Full text PdfPdf (350 KB)
Source
International Conference on Autonomous Agents archive
Proceedings of the 7th international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems - Volume 2 table of contents
Estoril, Portugal
SESSION: Economic paradigms table of contents
Pages: 871-878  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-0-9817381-1-6
Authors
Hala Mostafa  University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA
Victor Lesser  University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA
Gerome Miklau  University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA
Sponsors
AAAI : Association for the Advancement of Artifical Intelligence
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 5,   Downloads (12 Months): 40,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  

ABSTRACT

A database view is a dynamic virtual table composed of the result set of a query, often executed over different underlying databases. The view maintenance problem concerns how a view is refreshed when the data sources are updated. We study the view maintenance problem when self-interested database managers from different institutions are involved, each concerned about the privacy of its database. We regard view maintenance as an incremental, sequential process where an action taken at a stage affects what happens at later stages. The contribution of this paper is twofold. First, we formulate the view maintenance problem as a sequential game of incomplete information where at every stage, each database manager decides what information to disclose, if any, without knowledge of the number or nature of updates at other managers. This allows us to adopt a satisficing approach where the final view need not reflect 100% of the databases updates. Second, we present an anytime algorithm for calculating ε-Bayes-Nash equilibria that allows us to solve the large games which our problem translates to. Our algorithm is not restricted to games originating from the view maintenance problem; it can be used to solve general games of incomplete information. In addition, experimental results demonstrate our algorithm's attractive anytime behavior, which allows it to find good-enough solutions to large games within reasonable amounts of time.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
3
 
4
C. Y. Choi and Q. Luo. Template-based runtime invalidation for database-generated web contents. In Proceedings of Advanced Web Technologies and Applications, 6th Asia-Pacific Web Conference, AP Web 2004, Hangzhou, China, 2004.
5
6
7
 
8
 
9
M. Kearns and L. E. Ortiz. Maintaining views incrementally. In Proceedings of Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, MA, USA, 2004.
 
10
G. Liang and S. S. Chawathe. Privacy-preserving inter-database operations. In Proceedings of the Second Symposium on Intelligence and Security Informatics, Arizona, USA, 2004.
 
11
A. Manjhi, P. B. Gibbons, A. Ailamaki, C. Garrod, B. M. Maggs, T. C. Mowry, C. Olston, A. Tomasic, and H. Yu. Invalidation clues for database scalability services. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Data Engineering, Istanbul, Turkey, April 2007.
12
 
13
R. D. McKelvey, A. M. McLennan, and T. L. Turocy. Gambit: Software tools for game theory. http://gambit.sourceforge.net/, 2007.
 
14
M. Pearson and P. La Mura. Simulated annealing of game equilibria: A simple adaptive procedure leading to nash equilibrium. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on The Logic and Strategy of Distributed Agents, Trento, Italy, 2000.
15
16
 
17
T. Turocy. A dynamic homotopy interpretation of the logistic quantal response equilibrium correspondence. Games and Economic Behavior, 51:243--263, 2006.
 
18
 
19

Collaborative Colleagues:
Hala Mostafa: colleagues
Victor Lesser: colleagues
Gerome Miklau: colleagues