ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Information scraps: How and why information eludes our personal information management tools
Full text PdfPdf (6.27 MB)
Source
ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) archive
Volume 26 ,  Issue 4  (September 2008) table of contents
Article No. 24  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISSN:1046-8188
Authors
Michael Bernstein  Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
Max Van Kleek  Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
David Karger  Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
M. C. Schraefel  University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 153,   Downloads (12 Months): 767,   Citation Count: 5
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1402256.1402263
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In this article we investigate information scraps—personal information where content has been scribbled on Post-it notes, scrawled on the corners of sheets of paper, stuck in our pockets, sent in email messages to ourselves, and stashed in miscellaneous digital text files. Information scraps encode information ranging from ideas and sketches to notes, reminders, shipment tracking numbers, driving directions, and even poetry. Although information scraps are ubiquitous, we have much still to learn about these loose forms of information practice. Why do we keep information scraps outside of our traditional PIM applications? What role do information scraps play in our overall information practice? How might PIM applications be better designed to accommodate and support information scraps' creation, manipulation and retrieval?

We pursued these questions by studying the information scrap practices of 27 knowledge workers at five organizations. Our observations shed light on information scraps' content, form, media, and location. From this data, we elaborate on the typical information scrap lifecycle, and identify common roles that information scraps play: temporary storage, archiving, work-in-progress, reminding, and management of unusual data. These roles suggest a set of unmet design needs in current PIM tools: lightweight entry, unconstrained content, flexible use and adaptability, visibility, and mobility.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Allen, D. 2001. Getting Things Done: The Art of Stress-Free Productivity. Penguin Books, New York, NY.
 
2
 
3
4
5
 
6
7
8
 
9
 
10
Bernstein, M., Van Kleek, M., Khushraj, D., Nayak, R., Liu, C., Schraefel, M., and Karger, D. R. 2008. Wicked problems and gnarly results: Reflecting on design and evaluation methods for idiosyncratic personal information management tasks. Tech. rep. MIT.
11
12
 
13
14
 
15
Boardman, R., Spence, R., and Sasse, M. A. 2003. Too many hierarchies? The daily struggle for control of the workspace. In Proceedings of HCI International, Vol. 1, 616--620.
 
16
 
17
Bruce, H., Jones, W., and Dumais, S. 2004. Keeping and re-finding information on the Web: What do people do and what do they need. In Proceedings of ASIST.
18
19
20
 
21
Csikszentmihalyi, M. 1991. Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Harper Perennial.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
 
33
Gray, W. D. and Boehmdavis, D. A. 2000. Milliseconds matter: An introduction to microstrategies and to their use in describing and predicting interactive behavior. J. Experi. Psych. Appl. 6, 322--335.
34
 
35
36
 
37
Hodges, S., Williams, L., Berry, E., Izadi, S., Srinivasan, J., Butler, A., Smyth, G., Kapur, N., and Wood, K. 2006. SenseCam: A retrospective memory aid. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp'06). Springer, 177--193.
38
39
 
40
Humanized. Enso. http://www.humanized.com/enso/.
41
 
42
Ito, M. and Okabe, D. 2003. Camera phones changing the definition of picture-worthy. Japan Media Rev. 29.
 
43
Jones, W. 2004. Finders, keepers? The present and future perfect in support of personal information management. First Monday 9.
44
 
45
Jones, W. 2007a. Introduction. In Personal Information Management, W. Jones and J. Teevan, Eds. University of Washington Press, Seattle, WA, 3--21.
46
 
47
Jones, W., Dumais, S., and Bruce, H. 2005a. Once found, what then? A study of keeping behaviors in the personal use of Web information. In Proceedings of the Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. Techn. 39, 391--402.
 
48
Jones, W., Munat, C., and Bruce, H. 2005b. The universal labeler: Plan the project and let your information follow. In Proceedings of ASIST.
49
50
 
51
Karger, D. R. 2007. Unify Everything: It's All the Same To Me. In Personal Information Management, W. Jones and J. Teevan, Eds. University of Washington Press, Seattle, WA, 127--152.
52
 
53
Kelley, D. and Teevan, J. 2007. Understanding what works: Evaluating PIM tools. In Personal Information Management, W. Jones and J. Teevan, Eds. University of Washington Press, Seattle, WA, 190--205.
 
54
Khan, F. 1993. A survey of note-taking practices. Tech. rept. Hewlett Packard, HPL-93-107.
 
55
Kindberg, T., Spasojevic, M., Fleck, R., and Sellen, A. 2004. How and why people use camera phones Tech. rept. Hewlett Packard, HPL-2004--216.
 
56
Kirsh, D. and Maglio, P. P. 1994. On distinguishing epistemic from pragmatic action. Cogn. Sci. 18, 513--549.
 
57
Lamming, M., Brown, P., Carter, K., Eldridge, M., Flynn, M., Louie, G., Robinson, P., and Sellen, A. 1994. The design of a human memory prosthesis. Comput. J. 37, 153--163.
 
58
Lansdale, M. W. 1988. The psychology of personal information management. Appl. Ergonomics 19, 55--66.
 
59
Lichtenstein, S., Fischhoff, B., and Phillips, L. D. 1982. Calibration of probabilities: The state of the art to 1980. In Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., and Tversky, A., Eds. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 306--334.
60
61
62
 
63
Mcalpine, H., Hicks, B. J., Huet, G., and Culley, S. J. 2006. An investigation into the use and content of the engineer's logbook. Des. Stud. 27, 4, 481--504.
64
65
 
66
67
 
68
Rhodes, B. 1997. The wearable remembrance agent: A system for augmented memory. Person. Ubiquitous Comput. 1, 4, 218--224.
69
 
70
Ross, L. and Nisbett, R. 1991. The Person and the Situation: Perspectives of Social Psychology. McGraw-Hill. New York, NY.
71
72
 
73
74
75
 
76
Trapani, G. 2007. Lifehacker. http://www.lifehacker.com.
 
77
Van Kleek, M., Bernstein, M., Andre, P., Karger, D. R., and Schraefel, M. 2008. Simplifying knowledge creation and access for end-users on the SW. In CHI 2008 Workshop on Semantic Web User Interfaces.
78
 
79
 
80
Venolia, G. D., Dabbish, L. A., Cadiz, J. J., and Gupta, A. 2001. Supporting Email Workflow. Tech. rep. Microsoft Research, MSR-TR-2001--88.
 
81
Wagenaar, W. A. 1986. My memory: A study of autobiographical memory over six years. Cognitive psych. 18, 225--252.
82
83
 
84
Yates, F. A. 1966. The Art of Memory. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
85
86


Collaborative Colleagues:
Michael Bernstein: colleagues
Max Van Kleek: colleagues
David Karger: colleagues
M. C. Schraefel: colleagues