ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Alternating multiple tributaries + deltas
Full text PdfPdf (220 KB)
Source DMSN; Vol. 340 archive
Proceedings of the 5th workshop on Data management for sensor networks table of contents
Auckland, New Zealand
SESSION: Energy-efficient data management table of contents
Pages 28-34  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-284-9
Authors
Goce Trajcevski  Northwestern University
Oliviu Ghica  Northwestern University
Peter Scheuermann  Northwestern University
Roberto Tamassia  Brown University
Isabel F. Cruz  University of Illinois at Chicago
Sponsor
: Intel
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3,   Downloads (12 Months): 33,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1402050.1402057
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This work addresses the problem of trading off the latency in delivering the answer to the sink at the benefit of balancing the spatial dispersion of the energy consumption among the nodes and, consequently, prolonging the lifetime in sensor networks. Typically, in response to a query that pertains to the data from some geographic region, a tree structure is constructed and, when possible, some in-network aggregation is performed. On the other hand, in order to increase the robustness and/or balance the load, multipath routing is employed. Motivated by earlier work that combined trees and multipaths [19], in this paper we explore the possibility, and the impact, of combining multiple trees and multiple multipaths for routing, when processing a query with respect to a given region of interest. We present and evaluate two approaches that enable load-balancing in terms of alternating among a collection of routing structures.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
K. Akkaya and M. Younis. A survey on routing protocols for wireless sensor networks. Ad Hoc Networks, 3(3), 2005.
 
2
3
4
5
 
6
C. Buragohain, S. Gandhi, J. Hershberger, and S. Suri. Contour approximation in sensor networks. In DCOSS, 2006.
 
7
 
8
Crossbow Technology Inc. Mica2 wireless measurement sheet, http://www.xbow.com/.
 
9
10
 
11
Y. Ganjali and A. Keshavarzian. Load balancing in ad hoc networks: Single-path routing vs. multi-path routing. In INFOCOM, 2004.
 
12
 
13
A. Kaneko and M. Kano. Discrete geometry on red and blue points in the plane - a survey, 2003. http://gorogoro.cis.ibaraki.ac.jp/web/papers/kano2003-48.pdf.
 
14
 
15
S. Lee and M. Gerla. Split multipath routing with maximally disjoint paths in ad hoc networks. In IEEE-ICC, 2001.
 
16
W. Luo, W. Liu, and Y. Zhang. Performance optimizatin using multipath routing in mobile ad hoc and wireless sensor networks. Combinatorial Optimization in Communication Networks, 2, 2005.
17
18
19
20
 
21
G. Parissidis, V. Lenders, M. May, and B. Plattner. Multi-path routing protocols in wireless mobile and ad hoc networks: A quantitative comparison. In NEW2AN, 2006.
 
22
P. Thulasiraman, S. Ramasubramanian, and M. Krunz. Disjoint multipat routing to two distinct drains in a multi-drain sensor network. In INFOCOM, 2007.
 
23
 
24
 
25
V. Zadorozhny, P. Chrysanthis, and A. Labrinidis. Algebraic optimization of data delivery patterns in mobile sensor networks. In MDDS Workshop, 2004.
 
26
W. Zhang and G. Cao. Optimizing tree reconifguration for mobile target tracking in sensor networks. In IEEE INFOCOM, 2004.
 
27
 
28
A. Zollinger. Geographic routing. In Algorithms for Sensor and Ad Hoc Networks, pages 161--185, 2007.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Goce Trajcevski: colleagues
Oliviu Ghica: colleagues
Peter Scheuermann: colleagues
Roberto Tamassia: colleagues
Isabel F. Cruz: colleagues