|
ABSTRACT
Effective diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is of primary importance in biomedical research. Recent studies have demonstrated that neuroimaging parameters are sensitive and consistent measures of AD. In addition, genetic and demographic information have also been successfully used for detecting the onset and progression of AD. The research so far has mainly focused on studying one type of data source only. It is expected that the integration of heterogeneous data (neuroimages, demographic, and genetic measures) will improve the prediction accuracy and enhance knowledge discovery from the data, such as the detection of biomarkers. In this paper, we propose to integrate heterogeneous data for AD prediction based on a kernel method. We further extend the kernel framework for selecting features (biomarkers) from heterogeneous data sources. The proposed method is applied to a collection of MRI data from 59 normal healthy controls and 59 AD patients. The MRI data are pre-processed using tensor factorization. In this study, we treat the complementary voxel-based data and region of interest (ROI) data from MRI as two data sources, and attempt to integrate the complementary information by the proposed method. Experimental results show that the integration of multiple data sources leads to a considerable improvement in the prediction accuracy. Results also show that the proposed algorithm identifies biomarkers that play more significant roles than others in AD diagnosis.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
G. Alexander and et al. Regional network of MRI gray matter volume in healthy aging. Neuroreport, 17:951--956, 2006.
|
| |
2
|
G. Alexander and J. Moeller. Application of the scaled subprofile model to functional imaging in neuropsychiatric disorder: a principal component approach to modeling brain function in disease. Human Brain Mapping, 2(1-2):79--94, 2004.
|
| |
3
|
G. Alexander and E. Reiman. Neuroimaging. M.F. Weiner, A.M. Lipton (eds.). The Dementias: Diagnosis, Treatment and Research, 3rd edition, 2003.
|
 |
4
|
Ran Gilad-Bachrach , Amir Navot , Naftali Tishby, Margin based feature selection - theory and algorithms, Proceedings of the twenty-first international conference on Machine learning, p.43, July 04-08, 2004, Banff, Alberta, Canada
[doi> 10.1145/1015330.1015352]
|
| |
5
|
B. Bader and T. Kolda. MATLAB Tensor Toolbox Version 2.2. http://csmr.ca.sandia.gov/~tgkolda/TensorToolbox/, January 2007.
|
| |
6
|
|
| |
7
|
C.-C. Chang and C.-J. Lin. LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines, 2001. Software available at http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/~cjlin/libsvm.
|
| |
8
|
K. Chen, E. Reiman, G. Alexander, D. Bandy, R. Renaut, W. Crum, N. Fox, and M. Rossor. An automated algorithm for the computation of brain volume change from sequential MRI's using an iterative principal component analysis and its evaluation for the assessment of whole brain atrophy rates in patients with probable Alzheimer's disease. Neuroimage, 22(1):134--143, 2004.
|
| |
9
|
M. Davison. Multidimensional Scaling. New York: Wiley, 1983.
|
| |
10
|
C. Ding and J. Ye. 2-Dimensional singular value decomposition for 2D maps and images. In Proceedings of the Fifth SIAM International Conference on Data Mining (SDM), pages 24--34, 2005.
|
| |
11
|
|
| |
12
|
|
| |
13
|
|
| |
14
|
|
| |
15
|
X. He, D. Cai, and P. Niyogi. Laplacian score for feature selection. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 18. MIT Press, 2005.
|
| |
16
|
I. T. Jolliffe. Principal Component Analysis. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1986.
|
 |
17
|
|
| |
18
|
|
| |
19
|
|
| |
20
|
|
| |
21
|
J. Krasaski and et al. Relation of medial temporal lobe volumes to aget and memory function in nondemented adults with down's syndrome: implications for the prodromal phase of Alzheimer's disease. American Journal of Psychiatry, 159:74--81, 2002.
|
| |
22
|
|
| |
23
|
|
| |
24
|
O. Lange, A. Meyer-Baese, M. Hurdal, and S. Foo. A comparison between neural and fuzzy cluster analysis techniques for functional MRI. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 1(3):243--252, 2006.
|
| |
25
|
Lieven De Lathauwer , Bart De Moor , Joos Vandewalle, On the Best Rank-1 and Rank-(R1,R2,. . .,RN) Approximation of Higher-Order Tensors, SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications, v.21 n.4, p.1324-1342, March – May 2000
[doi> 10.1137/S0895479898346995]
|
| |
26
|
D. Leibovici and R. Sabatier. A singular value decomposition of k-way array for a principal component analysis of multiway data, PTA-k. Linear Algebra and Its Applications, 269:307--329, 1998.
|
| |
27
|
|
| |
28
|
Y. Li, C. Campbell, and M. Tipping. Bayesian automatic relevance determination algorithms for classifying gene expression data. BIOINFORMATICS, 18:1332--1339, 2002.
|
| |
29
|
|
| |
30
|
|
| |
31
|
H. Matsuda. Role of neuroimaging in Alzheimer's disease, with emphasis on brain perfusion SPECT. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 48(8):1289--1300, 2007.
|
| |
32
|
S. Molchan. The Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Business Briefing: US Neurology Review, pages 30--32, 2005.
|
| |
33
|
A. Ng, M. Jordan, and Y. Weiss. On spectral clustering: Analysis and an algorithm. In The 14th Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), 2001.
|
| |
34
|
K. Nishino, Y. Sato, and K. Ikeuchi. Eigen-texture method: appearance compression based on 3d model. In Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 618--624, 1999.
|
| |
35
|
D. Pokrajac, V. Megalooikonomou, A. Lazarevic, D. Kontos, and Z. Obradovic. Applying spatial distribution analysis techniques to classification of 3d medical images. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 33(3):261--280, 2005.
|
| |
36
|
E. Reiman, R. Caselli, G. Alexander, and K. Chen. Tracking the decline in cerebral glucose metabolism in persons and laboratory animals at genetic risk for Alzheimer's disease. Clinical Neuroscience Research, 1:194--206, 2001.
|
| |
37
|
B. Schökopf and A. Smola. Learning with Kernels: Support Vector Machines, Regularization, Optimization and Beyond. MIT Press, 2002.
|
| |
38
|
|
| |
39
|
|
| |
40
|
N. Tzourio-Mazoyer and et al. Automated anatomical labelling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single subject brain. Neuroimage, 15:273--289, 2002.
|
| |
41
|
|
 |
42
|
|
 |
43
|
|
| |
44
|
K. Worsley and K. Friston. Analysis of fMRI time series revisited-again. NeuroImage, 2:173--181, 1995.
|
| |
45
|
R. Wrede. Introduction to Vector and Tensor Analysis. New York: Wiley, 1963.
|
| |
46
|
|
 |
47
|
|
 |
48
|
|
| |
49
|
T. Zhang and R. Ando. Analysis of spectral kernel design based semi-supervised learning. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 18, pages 1601--1608, 2006.
|
 |
50
|
|
CITED BY 2
|
|
Jianhui Chen , Shuiwang Ji , Betul Ceran , Qi Li , Mingrui Wu , Jieping Ye, Learning subspace kernels for classification, Proceeding of the 14th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, August 24-27, 2008, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
|
|
|
Liang Sun , Rinkal Patel , Jun Liu , Kewei Chen , Teresa Wu , Jing Li , Eric Reiman , Jieping Ye, Mining brain region connectivity for alzheimer's disease study via sparse inverse covariance estimation, Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, June 28-July 01, 2009, Paris, France
|
|