ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Towards validation of DEVS-FIRE wildfire simulation model
Full text PdfPdf (438 KB)
Source
Spring Simulation Multiconference archive
Proceedings of the 2008 Spring simulation multiconference table of contents
Ottawa, Canada
SESSION: 2008 high performance computing symposium (HPC'08): Geophysical applications table of contents
Pages 355-361  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:1-56555-319-5
Authors
Feng Gu  Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA
Xiaolin Hu  Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA
Lewis Ntaimo  TAMU College Station, TX
Sponsors
SIGSIM: ACM Special Interest Group on Simulation and Modeling
(SCS) : The Society for Modeling and Simulation International
Publisher
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 8,   Downloads (12 Months): 50,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  

ABSTRACT

DEVS-FIRE is a model for discrete event simulation of wildfire spread, where fire spread is modeled as a contagion process in a cellular space of forest cells. In this paper, DEVS-FIRE is validated using FARSITE, a widely used fire spread model. Both graphical and statistical approaches are used and the results show that the output of DEVS-FIRE is comparable to that of FARSITE under a wide range of input conditions.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
USDA Testimony to Congress, 2004, accessed from www.fs.fed.us/congress/108/house/oversight/rey/050504.html.
 
2
NIFC, 2006, Wildland Fire Statistics, National Interagency Fire Center, accessed from www.nifc.gov/stats/wildlandfirestats.html.
 
3
 
4
 
5
Andrews, P. L., C. D. Bevins, R. C. Seli, 2005, BehavePlus Fire Modeling System, version 3.0: User's Guide Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-106WWW Revised, Ogden, UT: Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research 26 Station, pp. 132.
 
6
Morais, M., 2001, Comparing Spatially Explicit Models of Fire Spread through Chaparral Fuels: A New Model Based upon The Rothermel Fire Spread Equation, MA Thesis, University of California, Santa Barbara.
 
7
Mark A. Finney, 1998, FARSITE: Fire Area Simulator-Model Development and Evaluation, United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station Research Paper, RMRS-RP-4 Revised March 1998, revised February 2004.
 
8
Grabner, K. G., J. P. Dwyer, B. E. Cutter, 1997, Validation of BEHAVE Fire Behavior Predictions in Oak Savannas Using Five Fuel Models, Proc. Eleventh Central Hardwood Conf., Univ. of Missouri, Columbia, pp. 202--215.
 
9
Max Alan Moritz, Department of Physics, UCSB, accessed from http://www.physics.ucsb.edu/~complex/max/hfiresamo.html#output.
 
10
Arca et al., 2007, Evaluation of Farsite Simulator in A Mediterranean Area, The 4th International Wildland Fire Conference, Seville, Spain.
 
11
Ljiljana et al., 2005, Fire Modeling in Forest Fire Management, Proc.of Int. Conf. CEEPUS Spring School, Engineering for the Future, Katarzyna Ciosk, Malgorzata Suchanska.
 
12
Rothermel, R., 1972, A Mathematical Model for Predicting Fire Spread in Wildland Fuels, Research Paper INT-115, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT.
 
13
Finney, MA. Andrews, PL., 1994, The FARSITE Fire Area Simulator: Fire Management Applications and Lessons of Summer 1994, Proceedings of the 1994 Interior West Fire Council Meeting and Program, pp. 209--216.
 
14
Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory, accessed from http://www.firemodels.org/content/view/35/44/#lesson12.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Feng Gu: colleagues
Xiaolin Hu: colleagues
Lewis Ntaimo: colleagues