|
ABSTRACT
Students come to design education with different goals. Some seek to acquire expertise in design, others to learn specialized methods tailored to a research domain. Furthermore, students in the area of information system design confront a large literature of diverse perspectives on design, all of which are potentially useful. To disentangle this literature and to develop students' knowledge and know-how for design, a ten-week course, titled Theories and Practice of Design for Information Systems, was developed. Pedagogically, this introductory course is neither a studio course nor a methods course. Instead, it takes a "design perspectives" approach where students engage a number of substantial perspectives on design through conceptual and experiential study. This paper introduces this pedagogical approach and describes eight design perspectives including readings, key questions, and activities. It concludes with lessons learned for positioning students to engage the interplay between the theory and practice of information system design.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
Alexander, C. The Timeless Way of Building. Oxford University Press, New York, 1979.
|
| |
2
|
Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S. and Silverstein, M. A Pattern Language. Oxford University Press, New York, 1977.
|
| |
3
|
Bang, M. Picture This: Perception & Composition. A Bull Finch Press Book of Little Brown and Company, Boston MA, 1991.
|
| |
4
|
|
| |
5
|
Bucciarelli, L. L. Reflective practice in engineering design. Design Studies, 5, 3 (1984), 185--190.
|
| |
6
|
|
| |
7
|
|
 |
8
|
Thomas Erickson, Lingua Francas for design: sacred places and pattern languages, Proceedings of the 3rd conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques, p.357-368, August 17-19, 2000, New York City, New York, United States
[doi> 10.1145/347642.347794]
|
| |
9
|
Floyd, C., Mehl, W., Reisin, F., Schmidt, G. and Wolf, G. Out of Scandinavia: Alternative approaches to software design and system development. Human-Computer Interaction, 4, 4 (1989), 253--349.
|
| |
10
|
Friedman, B. Value Sensitive Design. http://projects.ischool.washington.edu/vsd/
|
| |
11
|
Friedman, B., Kahn, P. H., Jr., and Borning, A. Value Sensitive Design and information systems. In P. Zhang & D. Galletta (Eds.), Human-computer interaction in management information systems: Foundations. M. E. Sharpe, New York, 2006, 348--372.
|
| |
12
|
Greenberg, S. Working through task-centered system design. In D. Diaper & N. Stanton (Eds.) The Handbook of Task Analysis for Human-Computer Interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New York, 2003, 49--66.
|
| |
13
|
Human-Centered Computing Education Digital library, http://hcc.cc.gatech.edu/
|
 |
14
|
David G. Hendry , Sara Mackenzie , Ann Kurth , Freya Spielberg , Jim Larkin, Evaluating paper prototypes on the street, CHI '05 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, April 02-07, 2005, Portland, OR, USA
[doi> 10.1145/1056808.1056938]
|
 |
15
|
|
| |
16
|
Illich, I. Tools for conviviality. Harper & Row, New York, 1973, Chap. 1--2.
|
 |
17
|
Severin Isenmann , Wolf D. Reuter, IBIS—a convincing concept…but a lousy instrument?, Proceedings of the 2nd conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques, p.163-172, August 18-20, 1997, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
[doi> 10.1145/263552.263602]
|
| |
18
|
Jones, J. C. Design Methods (2nd Edition). John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1992.
|
| |
19
|
|
| |
20
|
Kuhn, S. Learning from the architectural studio: Implications for project-base pedagogy. International Journal of Engineering Education, 17, 4--5 (2001), 349--352.
|
| |
21
|
Lane, D. M., Napier, H. A., Batsell, R. R. and Naman, J. L. Predicting the skilled use of hierarchical menus with the keystroke-level model. Human-Computer Interaction, 8, 2 (1993), 185--192.
|
| |
22
|
Moran, T. P. and Carroll, J. M. Overview of Design Rationale. In T. P. Moran and J. M. Carroll (Eds.), Design Rationale: Concepts, Techniques, and Use. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, 1996, Chap. 1.
|
| |
23
|
Mountford, J. S. Tools and techniques for creative design. In B. Laurel (ed). The Art of Human-Computer Interface Design. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1990, 17--30.
|
| |
24
|
|
 |
25
|
|
| |
26
|
Rittel, H. W. J. and Webber, M. M. Dilemmas in general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4 (1973), 155--169.
|
| |
27
|
|
| |
28
|
Schön, D. A. Educating the Reflective Practitioner. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, CA, 1991, Chap. 3.
|
| |
29
|
|
| |
30
|
Douglas K. Van Duyne , James Landay , Jason I. Hong, The Design of Sites: Patterns, Principles, and Processes for Crafting a Customer-Centered Web Experience, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, 2002
|
| |
31
|
Wilde, J. and Wilde, R. Visual Literacy. Watson-Guptill, New York, 1991.
|
| |
32
|
|
INDEX TERMS
Primary Classification:
K.
Computing Milieux
K.3
COMPUTERS AND EDUCATION
K.3.2
Computer and Information Science Education
Additional Classification:
H.
Information Systems
H.5
INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
H.5.2
User Interfaces (D.2.2, H.1.2, I.3.6)
General Terms:
Design,
Human Factors
Keywords:
curriculum,
design education,
design patterns,
design rationale,
hierarchical decomposition,
learning to design,
participatory design,
personas,
reflective practice,
scenario-based design,
social processes in design,
value sensitive design
|