ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Paper interface to electronic medical records: a case of usage-driven technology appropriation
Full text PdfPdf (687 KB)
Source Designing Interactive Systems archive
Proceedings of the 7th ACM conference on Designing interactive systems table of contents
Cape Town, South Africa
Pages 40-49  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-002-9
Authors
Elin Rønby Pedersen  Google, Inc., Mountain View, California
Greg Wolff  Ricoh Innovations, Inc., Menlo Park, California
Sponsors
: Nokia
Microsoft : Microsoft
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
: SAP
: University of Cape Town
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 28,   Downloads (12 Months): 168,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1394445.1394450
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We conducted a 6-month project with a physical therapy clinic, involving equal parts ethnographic fieldwork and rapid prototyping. It differed from most reported user-informed design by having an explicit dual purpose. On the one hand, the prototype should provide significant, measurable improvements for the field site. On the other hand, the project sponsor did not intend to develop the prototype into a product but rather identify future opportunities and needs in the small-to-medium health care sector, requirements for next generation multifunction peripherals (MFPs), and business applications of existing technology. Thus, the project simultaneously investigated specific solutions for a specific work practice while looking for key technologies to address future needs. This paper provides a detailed account of the process and results, highlighting particular contingencies that come with a dual-purpose exploration, as well as the benefits of a small, focused team that "oscillates" between research and deployment.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
Cecil, R. F. (2006). Clash of the Titans: Agile and UCD. In online publication, UX Matters, http://www.uxmatters.com/MT/archives/000153.php
5
 
6
IDEO - Deep Dive (1999): Shopping Cart Concept http://www.ideo.com/portfolio/re.asp?x=50029
 
7
Kelley, T (2005) The Ten Faces of Innovation. Doubleday Press, 2005.
 
8
Kensing, F., J. Simonsen and K. Bødker (1998): MUST - a Method for Participatory Design. In Human-Computer Interaction, vol 13, no 2, 1998.
 
9
Morris, M, and A. Lund (2001) Experience Modeling: How are they made and what do they offer? In LOOP: AIGA Journal of Interaction Design Education, Number 7.
 
10
Muller, M (2002) Participatory Design: The Third Space in HCI Handbook of HCI. In Handbook of HCI. Elsevier Publishing, Mahway NJ USA: Erlbaum, 2003
 
11
Phillips, D. (2007) Research to reality: a business perspective. In Cefkin, M. and Anderson, K. (eds.) Being Heard. Proc. EPIC 2007 (www.epic2007.com).
 
12
Robinson, R. (1999) Things to Think With. In Doors Of Perception 6 conference, http://museum.doorsofperception.com/doors6/doors6/transcripts/robinson.html
13
 
14
 
15
Suchman, L. (2001) Building Bridges: Practice-based ethnographies of contemporary technology. In Schiffer, M. (Ed.) Anthropological Perspectives on Technology. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, pp. 163--177
16

Collaborative Colleagues:
Elin Rønby Pedersen: colleagues
Greg Wolff: colleagues