Auditory self-motion illusions ("circular vection") can be facilitated by vibrations and the potential for actual motion

ABSTRACT

It has long been known that sound fields rotating around a stationary, blindfolded observer can elicit self-motion illusions ("circular vection") in 20--60% of participants. Here, we investigated whether auditory circular vection might depend on whether participants sense and know that actual motion is possible or impossible. Although participants in auditory vection studies are often seated on moveable seats to suspend the disbelief of self-motion, it has never been investigated whether this does, in fact, facilitate vection. To this end, participants were seated on a hammock chair with their feet either on solid ground ("movement impossible" condition) or suspended ("movement possible" condition) while listening to individualized binaural recordings of two sound sources rotating synchronously at 60°/s. In addition, hardly noticeable vibrations were applied in half of the trials. Auditory circular vection was elicited in 8/16 participants. For those, adding vibrations enhanced vection in all dependent measures. Not touching solid ground increased the intensity of self-motion and the feeling of actually rotating in the physical room. Vection onset latency and the percentage of trials where vection was elicited were only marginally significantly (p<.10) affected, though. Together, this suggests that auditory self-motion illusions can be stronger when one senses and knows that physical motion might, in fact, be possible (even though participants always remained stationary). Furthermore, there was a benefit both of adding vibrations and having one's feet suspended. These results have important implications both for our theoretical understanding of self-motion perception and for the applied field of self-motion simulations, where both vibrations and the cognitive/perceptual framework that actual motion is possible can typically be provided at minimal cost and effort.

REFERENCES

• 1: Andersen, G. J., and Braunstein, M. L. 1985. Induced self-motion in central vision. Journal of Experimental Psychology - Human Perception and Performance 11, 2, 122--132.
• 2: Berthoz, A., Pavard, B., and Young, L. R. 1975. Perception of linear horizontal self-motion induced by peripheral vision (linearvection) - basic characteristics and visual-vestibular interactions. Exp. Brain Res. 23, 5, 471--489.
• 3: Bles, W. 1981. Stepping around: circular vection and coriolis effects. Attention and performance, 47--61.
• 4: Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• 5: Dichgans, J., and Brandt, T. 1978. Visual-vestibular interaction: Effects on self-motion perception and postural control. In Perception, R. Held, H. W. Leibowitz, and H.-L. Teuber, Eds., vol. VIII of Handbook of Sensory Physiology. Springer, 756--804.
• 6: Dodge, R. 1923. Thresholds of rotation. J. Exp. Psychol. 6, 107--137.
• 7: Ernst, M. O., and Banks, M. S. 2002. Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature 415 (Jan.), 429--433.
• 8: Ernst, M. O., and Bülthoff, H. H. 2004. Merging the senses into a robust percept. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8, 4 (Apr.), 162--169.
• 9: Feuereissen, D. 2008. VR: Getting the Reality Part Straight - Does Jitter and Suspension of the Human Body Increase Auditory Circular Vection? Bachelor's thesis, Department of Computer Science in Media, Furtwangen University, Germany. Available: http://webuser.fh-furtwangen.de/~fetzner/spacestudies/uploads/uploads/vr-vection-t1.pdf.
• 10: Gekhman, B. 1991. Audiokinetic nystagmus. Sensornye Sistemy 5, 2, 71--78. (in Russion).
• 11: Hennebert, P. E. 1960. Audiokinetic nystagmus. Journal of Auditory Research 1, 1, 84--87.
• 12: Hettinger, L. J. 2002. Illusory self-motion in virtual environments. In Handbook of Virtual Environments, K. M. Stanney, Ed. Lawrence Erlbaum, ch. 23, 471--492.
• 13: Khasnis, A., and Gokula, R. M. 2003. Romberg's test. J Postgrad Med 49, 2, 169--172. Available: http://www.jpgmonline.com/text.asp?2003/49/2/169/894.
• 14: Lackner, J. R. 1977. Induction of illusory self-rotation and nystagmus by a rotating sound-field. Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine 48, 2, 129--131.
• 15: Larsson, P., Västfjäll, D., and Kleiner, M. 2004. Perception of self-motion and presence in auditory virtual environments. In Proceedings of 7th Annual Workshop of Presence, 252--258. Available: www.kyb.mpg.de/publication.html?publ=2953.
• 16: Lepecq, J. C., Giannopulu, I., and Baudonniere, P. M. 1995. Cognitive effects on visually induced body motion in children. Perception 24, 4, 435--449.
• 17: Mach, E. 1875. Grundlinien der Lehre von der Bewe-gungsempfindung. Engelmann, Leipzig, Germany.
• 18: Marmekarelse, A. M., and Bles, W. 1977. Circular vection and human posture ii: Does the auditory-system play a role. Agressologie 18, 6, 329--333.
• 19: Mergner, T., and Becker, W. 1990. Perception of horizontal self-rotation: Multisensory and cognitive aspects. In Perception & Control of Self-Motion, R. Warren and A. H. Wertheim, Eds. Erlbaum, New Jersey, London, 219--263.
• 20: Palmisano, S., Gillam, B. J., and Blackburn, S. G. 2000. Global-perspective jitter improves vection in central vision. Perception 29, 1, 57--67.
• 21: Palmisano, S., Burke, D., and Allison, R. S. 2003. Coherent perspective jitter induces visual illusions of self-motion. Perception 32, 1, 97--110.
• 22: Pavard, B., and Berthoz, A. 1977. Linear acceleration modifies perceived velocity of a moving visual scene. Perception 6, 5, 529--540.
• 23: Riecke, B. E., Schulte-Pelkum, J., Caniard, F., and Bülthoff, H. H. 2005. Influence of Auditory Cues on the visually-induced Self-Motion Illusion (Circular Vection) in Virtual Reality. In Proceedings of 8th Annual Workshop Presence 2005, 49--57.
• 24: Bernhard E. Riecke , Jorg Schulte-Pelkum , Franck Caniard , Heinrich H. Bulthoff, Towards Lean and Elegant Self-Motion Simulation in Virtual Reality, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE Conference 2005 on Virtual Reality, p.131-138, March 12-16, 2005 [doi>10.1109/VR.2005.83]
• 25: Bernhard E. Riecke , Jorg Schulte-Pelkum , Franck Caniard , Heinrich H. Bulthoff, Towards Lean and Elegant Self-Motion Simulation in Virtual Reality, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE Conference 2005 on Virtual Reality, p.131-138, March 12-16, 2005 [doi>10.1109/VR.2005.83]
• 26: Bernhard E. Riecke , Markus Von Der Heyde , Heinrich H. Bülthoff, Visual cues can be sufficient for triggering automatic, reflexlike spatial updating, ACM Transactions on Applied Perception (TAP), v.2 n.3, p.183-215, July 05 [doi>10.1145/1077399.1077401]
• 27: Bernhard E. Riecke , Jörg Schulte-Pelkum , Marios N. Avraamides , Markus Von Der Heyde , Heinrich H. Bülthoff, Cognitive factors can influence self-motion perception (vection) in virtual reality, ACM Transactions on Applied Perception (TAP), v.3 n.3, p.194-216, July 2006 [doi>10.1145/1166087.1166091]
• 28: Riecke, B. E., Schulte-Pelkum, J., and Caniard, F. 2006. Visually induced linear vection is enhanced by small physical accelerations. In 7th International Multisensory Research Forum (IMRF). Available: www.kyb.mpg.de/publication.html?publ=3901.
• 29: Bernhard E. Riecke , Daniel Feuereissen , John J. Rieser, Auditory self-motion illusions ("circular vection") can be facilitated by vibrations and the potential for actual motion, Proceedings of the 5th symposium on Applied perception in graphics and visualization, August 09-10, 2008, Los Angeles, California [doi>10.1145/1394281.1394309]
• 30: Riecke, B. E., Feuereissen, D., and Rieser, J. J. 2008. Contribution and interaction of auditory and biomechanical cues for self-motion illusions ("circular vection"). In Proceedings of CyberWalk workshop. Available: http://www.kyb.mpg.de/publication.html?publ=5043.
• 31: Sakamoto, S., Osada, Y., Suzuki, Y., and Gyoba, J. 2004. The effects of linearly moving sound images on selfmotion perception. Acoustical Science and Technology 25, 100--102.
• 32: Schulte-Pelkum, J., and Riecke, B. E. 2008. An integrative approach to presence and self-motion perception research. In Immersed in Media Experiences: Presence Psychology and Design (Handbook of Presence). Lawrence Erlbaum. in print.
• 33: Schulte-Pelkum, J., Riecke, B. E., and Bülthoff, H. H. 2004. Vibrational cues enhance believability of egomotion simulation. In International Multisensory Research Forum (IMRF). Available: www.kyb.mpg.de/publication.html?publ=2766.
• 34: Schulte-Pelkum, J. 2008. Perception of self-motion: Vection experiments in multi-sensory Virtual Environments. PhD thesis, Ruhr-Universität Bochum. (submitted).
• 35: Väljamäe, A., Larsson, P., Västfjäll, D., and Kleiner, M. 2004. Auditory presence, individualized head-related transfer functions, and illusory egomotion in virtual environments. In Proceedings of 7th Annual Workshop of Presence, 141--147.
• 36: Väljamäe, A., Larsson, P., Västfjäll, D., and Kleiner, M. 2006. Vibrotactile enhancement of auditory induced self-motion and spatial presence. Journal of the Acoustic Engineering Society 54, 10, 954--963.
• 37: von Helmholtz, H. 1867. Handbuch der physiologischen Optik. Voss, Leipzig.
• 38: Väljamäe, A. 2005. Self-motion and presence in the perceptual optimization of a multisensory virtual reality environment. Licentiate dissertation, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden. Available: http://lab5.ta.chalmers.se/~sasha/Aleksander_Valjamae_Licentiate.pdf.
• 39: Väljamäe, A. 2007. Sound for Multisensory Motion Simulators. PhD thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden.
• 40: Warren, R., and Wertheim, A. H., Eds. 1990. Perception & Control of Self-Motion. Erlbaum, New Jersey, London.
• 41: Wong, S. C. P., and Frost, B. J. 1981. The effect of visual-vestibular conflict on the latency of steady-state visually induced subjective rotation. Perception & Psychophysics 30, 3, 228--236.
• 42: Wright, W. G., DiZio, P., and Lackner, J. R. 2006. Perceived self-motion in two visual contexts: dissociable mechanisms underlie perception. J Vestib Res 16, 1--2, 23--28.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.1 MODELS AND PRINCIPLES
      H.1.2 User/Machine Systems

Additional Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.1 Multimedia Information Systems
          Subjects: Artificial, augmented, and virtual realities

  J. Computer Applications
  J.4 SOCIAL AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES

Keywords:
auditory vection, circular vection, cue-integration, higher-level/cognitive influences, human factors, psychophysics, self-motion illusions, self-motion simulation, vibrations, virtual reality