ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Some(what) grand challenges for information retrieval
Full text PdfPdf (452 KB)
Source
ACM SIGIR Forum archive
Volume 42 ,  Issue 1  (June 2008) table of contents
COLUMN: ECIR reports table of contents
Pages 47-54  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISSN:0163-5840
Author
Nicholas J. Belkin  Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 16,   Downloads (12 Months): 201,   Citation Count: 3
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1394251.1394261
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Although we see the positive results of information retrieval research embodied throughout the Internet, on our computer desktops, and in many other aspects of daily life, at the same time we notice that people still have a wide variety of difficulties in finding information that is useful in resolving their problematic situations. This suggests that there still remain substantial challenges for research in IR. Already in 1988, on the occasion of receiving the ACM SIGIR Gerard Salton Award, Karen Spärck Jones suggested that substantial progress in information retrieval was likely only to come through addressing issues associated with users (actual or potential) of IR systems, rather than continuing IR research's almost exclusive focus on document representation and matching and ranking techniques. In recent years it appears that her message has begun to be heard, yet we still have relatively few substantive results that respond to it. In this paper, I identify and discuss a few challenges for IR research which fall within the scope of association with users, and which I believe, if properly addressed, are likely to lead to substantial increases in the usefulness, usability and pleasurability of information retrieval.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
Borlund, P. (2003). The IIR Evaluation Model: a Framework for Evaluation of Interactive Information Retrieval Systems. In: Information Research, vol. 8, no. 3, paper no. 152. {Available at: http://informationr.net/ir/8-3/paper152.html}
3
 
4
Cool, C. & Belkin, N. J. (2002). A classification of interactions with information. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Conceptions of Library and Information Science (pp. 1--15). Greenwood Village, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
 
5
 
6
 
7
Järvelin, K., Price, S. L., Delcambre, L. M. L. & Nielsen, M. L. Discounted Cumulated Gain Based Evaluation of Multiple-Query IR Sessions. In ECIR 2008, Proceedings of the 2008 European Conference on Information Retrieval (pp. 4--15). Berlin: Springer Verlag.
 
8
Kelly, D. (2005). Implicit feedback: Using behavior to infer relevance. In A. Spink and C. Cole (Eds.) New Directions in Cognitive Information Retrieval (pp. 169--186). Berlin: Springer Verlag.
9
10
 
11
Kuhlthau, C. C. (1991). Inside the search process: information seeking from the user's perspective. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42, 361--371.
 
12
Nahl, D. & Bilal, D. eds (2007) Information and emotion: The Emergent Affective Paradigm in Information Behavior Research and Theory. Medford, NJ: Information Today for ASIST.
13
 
14
15
16
 
17
Spärck Jones, K. (2005). Meta-reflections on TREC. In E. M. Voorhees & D. K. Harman (Eds.) TREC: Experiment and Evaluation in Information Retrieval (pp. 421--448). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18
19
20
21