ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Impact of dynamic voltage and frequency scaling on the architectural vulnerability of GALS architectures
Full text PdfPdf (758 KB)
Source
International Symposium on Low Power Electronics and Design archive
Proceeding of the 13th international symposium on Low power electronics and design table of contents
Bangalore, India
SESSION: Microarchitectural techniques table of contents
Pages 351-356  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-109-5
Authors
Niranjan Soundararajan  The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
Narayanan Vijaykrishnan  The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
Anand Sivasubramaniam  The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGDA: ACM Special Interest Group on Design Automation
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): n/a,   Downloads (12 Months): n/a,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1393921.1394016
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Aggressive technology scaling is increasing the impact of soft errors on microprocessor reliability. Dynamic Voltage Frequency Scaling (DFVS) algorithms are conventionally studied from a performance per watt basis. But applying DVFS impacts reliability as well. Since DVFS affects the occupancy of different pipeline structures, they impact the soft error masking seen at the architectural level. Architectural Vulnerability Factors (AVF) captures this masking and in this work we study the impact of DVFS on AVF in a GALS environment. We show that the AVF of pipeline structures could vary by as much as 80% between different DVFS algorithms. Since AVF has a significant impact on the Mean Time To Failure (MTTF) of a system, these results indicate that when choosing a particular DVFS algorithm their reliability impact cannot be ignored. Hence we provide the Vulnerability Efficiency for the DVFS algorithms which captures their ability to optimize performance, power and reliability. Our results show that a Non-DVFS environment optimizes vulnerability efficiency better than any of the DVFS algorithms.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
2
 
3
X. Fu, T. Li, and J. Fortes. Sim-soda: A framework for microarchitecture reliability analysis. In In Proceedings of the Workshop on Modeling, Benchmarking and Simulation (Held in conjunction with International Symposium on Computer Architecture), 2006.
4
 
5
6
 
7
 
8
9
 
10
11
 
12
 
13
K. Ünlü, V. Narayanan, S. M.Cetiner, V. Degalahal, and M. J.Irwin. Neutron-induced soft error rate measurements in semiconductor memories. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A, 579:252--255, 2007.
14
15
 
16

Collaborative Colleagues:
Niranjan Soundararajan: colleagues
Narayanan Vijaykrishnan: colleagues
Anand Sivasubramaniam: colleagues