| Variation-aware gate sizing and clustering for post-silicon optimized circuits |
| Full text |
Pdf
(483 KB)
|
Source
|
International Symposium on Low Power Electronics and Design
archive
Proceeding of the 13th international symposium on Low power electronics and design
table of contents
Bangalore, India
SESSION: Variability-aware optimization
table of contents
Pages 105-110
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-109-5
|
|
Authors
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6, Downloads (12 Months): 85, Citation Count: 0
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
As technology is aggressively scaled, nano-regime VLSI designs are becoming increasingly susceptible to process variations. Unlike pre-silicon optimization, post-silicon techniques can tune the individual die to better meet the power-delay constraints. This paper proposes a variation-aware methodology for the simultaneous gate sizing and clustering for post-silicon tuning with adaptive body biasing. The proposed methodology uses an accurate table look-up model and fully explores the interaction between gate sizing and optimal body bias based clustering. In addition, it is suitable for industrial test cases with tens of thousands gates. Our optimization methodology includes a body bias distribution alignment strategy to mitigate the impact of critical gates. In this way, the cluster's body bias voltage is not simply determined by only a few critical gates. We also prove the linear dependence between the mean of the body bias probability distribution and the gate size. Based on this, we further investigate a simultaneous sizing and re-clustering algorithm for better leakage savings. A circuit re-balancing and gate snapping scheme is then suggested to map the solution to a standard cell library. Compared with arecently-reported method, the proposed methodology can obtain on average 25.5% leakage saving at nearly the same run time.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
 |
1
|
Shekhar Borkar , Tanay Karnik , Siva Narendra , Jim Tschanz , Ali Keshavarzi , Vivek De, Parameter variations and impact on circuits and microarchitecture, Proceedings of the 40th conference on Design automation, June 02-06, 2003, Anaheim, CA, USA
[doi> 10.1145/775832.775920]
|
| |
2
|
J. Tschanz, J. Kao, S. Narendra, R. Nair, D. Antoniadis, A. Chandrakasan, and V. De, "Adaptive body bias for reducing impacts of die-to-die and within-die parameter variations on microprocessor frequency and leakage," IEEE JSSC, vol. 37, no. 11, pp. 1396--1401, Nov. 2002.
|
| |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
|
 |
5
|
|
 |
6
|
|
 |
7
|
Jaskirat Singh , Vidyasagar Nookala , Zhi-Quan Luo , Sachin Sapatnekar, Robust gate sizing by geometric programming, Proceedings of the 42nd annual conference on Design automation, June 13-17, 2005, Anaheim, California, USA
[doi> 10.1145/1065579.1065662]
|
 |
8
|
|
 |
9
|
|
 |
10
|
|
| |
11
|
|
| |
12
|
|
| |
13
|
K. Ishibashi, "Adaptive body bias techniques for low power SOC," Presentation at "Adaptive Techniques for Dynamic Processor Optimization"in ISSCC, 2007.
|
| |
14
|
CPLEX, http://www.ilog.com/products/cplex/.
|
|