ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Optimal technology selection for minimizing energy and variability in low voltage applications
Full text PdfPdf (362 KB)
Source
International Symposium on Low Power Electronics and Design archive
Proceeding of the 13th international symposium on Low power electronics and design table of contents
Bangalore, India
SESSION: Variation tolerant circuits table of contents
Pages 9-14  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-109-5
Authors
Mingoo Seok  University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Dennis Sylvester  University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
David Blaauw  University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGDA: ACM Special Interest Group on Design Automation
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 21,   Downloads (12 Months): 137,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1393921.1393930
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Ultra Low voltage operation has recently drawn significant attention due to its large potential energy savings. However, typical design practices used for super-threshold operation are not necessarily compatible with the low voltage regime. Here, radically different guidelines may be needed since existing process technologies have been optimized for super-threshold operation. We therefore study the selection of the optimal technology in ultra low voltage designs to achieve minimum energy and minimum variability which are among foremost concerns. We investigate five industrial technologies, from 250nm to 65nm. We demonstrate that mature technologies are often the best choice in very low voltage applications, saving as much as ~1800X in total energy consumption compared to a poorly selected technology. In parallel, the effect of technology choice on variability is investigated, when operating at the energy optimal design point. The results show up to a 4X improvement in delay variation due to global process shift and mismatch when using the most advanced technologies despite their large variability at nominal Vdd.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
M. Seok, et al, "The Phoenix Processor: A 30pW Platform for Sensor Applications", Symposium on VLSI Circuits, to be published in 2008
 
2
H. Kaul, et al, "A 320mV 56uW 411GOPS/Watt Ultra-Low-Voltage Motion-Estimation Accelerator in 65nm CMOS", ISSCC , 2008
 
3
A. Wang, et al, "A 180mV FFT Processor Using Subthreshold Circuit Techniques", ISSCC, 2004
 
4
B. Calhoun, et al, "Ultra Dynamic Voltage Scaling using Sub-Threshold Operation and Local Voltage Dithering in 90nm CMOS", ISSCC, 2005
 
5
B. Calhoun, et al, "A 256kb Sub-threshold SRAM in 65nm CMOS", ISSCC, 2006
 
6
B. Zhai, et al, "A sub-200mV 6T SRAM in 130nm CMOS", ISSCC, 2007
 
7
N. Verma, et al, "A 65nm 8T Sub-Vt SRAM Employing Sense-Amplifier Redundancy", ISSCC, 2007
 
8
T. Kim, et al, "A High-Density Subthreshold SRAM with Data-Independent Bitline Leakage and Virtual Ground Replica Scheme", ISSCC, 2007
 
9
S. Hanson, et al, "Performance and Variability Optimization Strategies in a 150mV Subthreshold Processor", Symposium on VLSI Circuits, 2007
 
10
M. Hwang, et al, "A 85mV 40nW Process-Tolerant Subthreshold 8x8 FIR Filter in 130nm Technology", Symposium on VLSI circuits, 2007
 
11
J. Kulkarni, et al, "A 160mV Robust Schmitt Trigger Based Subthreshold SRAM", JSSC vol.42 no.10, Oct 2007
 
12
J. Kwong, et al, "A 65nm Sub-Vt Microcontroller with Integrated SRAM and Switched-Capacitor DC-DC Converter", ISSCC, 2008
 
13
I. Chang, et al, "A 32kb 10T Subthreshold SRAM Array with Bit-Interleaving and Differential Read Scheme in 90nm CMOS", ISSCC, 2008
 
14
B. Zhai, et al, "A 2.60pJ/Inst Subthreshold Sensor Processor for Optimal Energy Efficiency", Symposium on VLSI circuits, 2006
 
15
International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors, 2005
16
17
 
18
L. Nazhadili, et al, "SenseBench: Toward on Accurate Evaluation of Sensor Network Processors", Workload Characterization Symposium, 2005
19
20
 
21
B. Paul, "Device Optimization for Digital Subthreshold Logic Operation", TED vol.52 no.2, Feb 2005
22
23
24
25
 
26
 
27
Y. Takeyama, et al, "A Low Leakage SRAM Macro with Replica Cell Biasing Scheme", JSCC vol.41 no.4, April 2006
 
28
A. Agarwal, et al, "A single-Vt Low-Leakage Gated-Grounded Cache for Deep Submicron", JSSC vol 38 no.2, Feb 2003
29
30
31
 
32
33
 
34
M.J.M. Pelgrom, et al., "Matching properties of MOS transistors", JSSC vol.24, no.5, 1989
 
35
V. Verma, et al, "Nanometer MOSFET Variation in Minimum Energy Subthreshold Circuits", TED vol.55 no.1, Jan 2008

Collaborative Colleagues:
Mingoo Seok: colleagues
Dennis Sylvester: colleagues
David Blaauw: colleagues