ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Security analysis of Internet technology components enabling globally distributed workplaces—a framework
Full text PdfPdf (1.60 MB)
Source
ACM Transactions on Internet Technology (TOIT) archive
Volume 8 ,  Issue 4  (September 2008) table of contents
Article No. 17  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISSN:1533-5399
Authors
Manish Gupta  M&T Bank Corporation, Buffalo, NY
Shamik Banerjee  Conagra Foods Inc., Omaha, NB
Manish Agrawal  University of South Florida, Tampa, FL
H. Raghav Rao  State University of New York, Buffalo, NY
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 99,   Downloads (12 Months): 955,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1391949.1391951
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

As organizations increasingly operate, compete, and cooperate in a global context, business processes are also becoming global to propagate the benefits from coordination and standardization across geographical boundaries. In this context, security has gained significance due to increased threats, as well as legislation and compliance issues. This article presents a framework for assessing the security of Internet technology components that support a globally distributed workplace. Four distinct information flow and design architectures are identified based on location sensitivities and placements of the infrastructure components. Using a combination of scenarios, architectures, and technologies, the article presents the framework of a development tool for information security officers to evaluate the security posture of an information system. To aid managers in better understanding their options to improve security of the system, we also propose a three-dimensional representation, based on the framework, for embedding solution alternatives. To demonstrate its use in a real-world context, the article also applies the framework to assess a globally distributed workforce application at a northeast financial institution.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Agrawal, M., Kuo, C.-J., Nam, K., and Rao, H. R. 2003. Electronic commerce infrastructure. Encyclopedia of Information Systems, H. Bidgoli, ed. Academic Press, 29--46.
 
2
Ahituv, N. 1980. A systematic approach toward assessing the value of an information system. MIS Q. 4, 61--75.
 
3
 
4
Axelrod, W. 2007. Analyzing risks to determine a new return on security investment. Managing Information Assurance in Financial Services, H.R. Rao et al. eds., Idea Group, Hershey, PA, 6--36.
 
5
 
6
 
7
Campbell, H. 1998. Risk assessment: Subjective or objective? Eng. Sci. Edu. J. 7, 57--63.
 
8
Department of Defense. 1984. Procedures for performing failure mode effects and criticality analysis. http://www.fmeainfocentre.com/handbooks/milstd1629.pdf.
 
9
Department of Homeland Security. 2006. Homeland Security Advisory System.
 
10
Earl, M. J. 2002. The risks of outsourcing IT. Sloan Manag. Rev. 37, 26--32.
 
11
Ekanayaka, Y., Currie, W., and Seltsikas, P. 2002. Delivering enterprise resource planning systems through ASPs. J. Logistics Inf. Manag. 15, 192--203.
 
12
Elky, S. 2006. An introduction to information system risk management. SANS Institute, 16.
13
 
14
Feller, W. 1950. An Introduction to Probability Theory and its Applications. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
 
15
Felten, E. W., Balfanz, D., Dean, D., and Wallach, D. S. 1997. Web spoofing: An Internet con game. In Proceedings of the 20th National Information Systems Security Conference, Baltimore, MD.
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
Gupta, M., Rao, H. R., and Upadhyaya, S. 2004. Electronic banking and information assurance issues: Survey and synthesis. J. Organiz. End User Comput. 16, 1--21.
 
21
Hagel III, J. and Brown, J. S. 2001. Your next IT strategy. Harvard Bus. Rev., 105--113.
22
 
23
International Security Technology (IST Inc) 2000. Managing risks using CORA.
 
24
 
25
Karabacak, B. and Sogukpinar, I. ISRAM: Information security risk analysis method. Comput. Secur. 24, 147--159.
 
26
Kumamoto, H. and Henley, E., 1996. Probabilistic Risk Assessment for Engineers and Scientists. IEEE.
27
 
28
Lao, G. and Wang, L. 2007. Security risk management strategy of financial services institutions. Managing Information Assurance in Financial Services, In H. R. Rao et al. eds. Idea Group, Hershey, PA.
 
29
Markowitz, H. M. 1991. Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investments. Blackwell.
 
30
McIlroy, M. D. 1968. Mass-Produced software components. In Proceedings of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) Conference on Software Engineering, Garmisch-Partenkirchen, NATO Science Commitee, 138--150.
 
31
Microsoft. 2006. Security Risk Management Guide. Microsoft, Redmond, WA.
 
32
 
33
 
34
Sahajpal, G., Agrawal, M., Kishore, R., and Rao, H. R. 2006. Business process offshoring to India: An overview. Outsourcing, In A. Heinzl et al. eds.
 
35
Seshasai, S., Malter, A. J., and Gupta, A. 2006. The use of information systems in collocated and distributed teams: A test of the 24-hour knowledge factory. In Proceedings of the SSRN eLibrary, SSRN.
36
 
37
 
38
Sitkin, S. B. and Pablo, A. L. Reconceptualizing the determinants of risk behavior. Academ. Manag. Rev. 17, 9--38.
 
39
Stolen, K., Braber, D., F, L., and Aagedal, J. 2002. Model-Based risk assessment—The CORAS approach.
 
40
Stoneburner, G., Goguen, A., and Feringa, A. 2002. Risk management guide for information technology systems, National Institute for Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, 55.
 
41
 
42
 
43


Collaborative Colleagues:
Manish Gupta: colleagues
Shamik Banerjee: colleagues
Manish Agrawal: colleagues
H. Raghav Rao: colleagues