ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Concurrent topology and routing optimization in automotive network integration
Full text PdfPdf (535 KB)
Source Annual ACM IEEE Design Automation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 45th annual Design Automation Conference table of contents
Anaheim, California
SESSION: Design methods for on-chip communication table of contents
Pages 626-629  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN ~ ISSN:0738-100X , 978-1-60558-115-6
Authors
Martin Lukasiewycz  University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany
Michael Glaß  University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany
Christian Haubelt  University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany
Jürgen Teich  University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany
Richard Regler  EE-81, Audi AG, Ingolstadt, Germany
Bardo Lang  EE-81, Audi AG, Ingolstadt, Germany
Sponsors
SIGDA: ACM Special Interest Group on Design Automation
: IEEE/CASS/CANDE/CEDA
: The EDA Consortium
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 8,   Downloads (12 Months): 56,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1391469.1391629
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In this paper, a novel automatic approach for the concurrent topology and routing optimization that achieves a high quality network layout is proposed. This optimization is based on a specialized binary Integer Linear Program (ILP) in combination with a Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm (MOEA). The ILP is formulated such that each solution represents a topology and routing that fulfills all requirements and demands of the network. Thus, in an iterative process, this ILP is solved to obtain feasible networks whereas the MOEA is used for the optimization of multiple even non-linear objectives and ensures a fast convergence towards the optimal solutions. Additionally, a domain specific preprocessing algorithm for the ILP is presented that decreases the problem complexity and, thus, allows to optimize large and complex networks efficiently. The experimental results validate the performance of this methodology on two state-of-the-art prototype automotive networks.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
CAN. Controller Area Network. http://www.can.bosch.com/.
3
4
 
5
M. Gruber and G. Raindl. A new 0--1 ILP approach for the bounded diameter minimum spanning tree problem. In Proc. of INOC '05, volume 1, pages 178--185, Lisbon, Portugal, 2005.
 
6
J. D. Knowles and D. W. Corne. A comparison of encodings and algorithms for multiobjective spanning tree problems. In Proc. of CEC '01, pages 544--551, 2001.
 
7
A. Konak and A. Smith. Capacitated network design considering survivability: An evolutionary approach. In Journal of Engineering Optimization, volume 36(2), pages 189--205, 2004.
 
8
R. Kumar, P. K. Singh, and P. P. Chakrabarti. Multiobjective EA approach for improved quality of solutions for spanning tree problem. In Proc. of EMO '05, pages 811--825, 2005.
 
9
M. Lukasiewycz, M. Glaß, C. Haubelt, and J. Teich. Sat-decoding in evolutionary algorithms for discrete constrained optimization problems. In Proc. of the CEC '07, pages 935--942, 2007.
 
10
 
11
Opt4J. Optimization framework for java. http://www.opt4j.org/.
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
T. Streichert, C. Haubelt, and J. Teich. Multi-Objective Topology Optimization for Networked Embedded Systems. In Proc. of IC-SAMOS '06, pages 93--98, 2006.
 
16
 
17
E. Zitzler, M. Laumanns, and L. Thiele. SPEA2: Improving the Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm. In Proc. of EUROGEN '01, pages 95--100, 2002.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Martin Lukasiewycz: colleagues
Michael Glaß: colleagues
Christian Haubelt: colleagues
Jürgen Teich: colleagues
Richard Regler: colleagues
Bardo Lang: colleagues