ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Run-time instruction set selection in a transmutable embedded processor
Full text PdfPdf (1.12 MB)
Source Annual ACM IEEE Design Automation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 45th annual Design Automation Conference table of contents
Anaheim, California
SESSION: Novel techniques in embedded processor design table of contents
Pages 56-61  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN ~ ISSN:0738-100X , 978-1-60558-115-6
Authors
Lars Bauer  University of Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany
Muhammad Shafique  University of Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany
Jörg Henkel  University of Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany
Sponsors
SIGDA: ACM Special Interest Group on Design Automation
: IEEE/CASS/CANDE/CEDA
: The EDA Consortium
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 13,   Downloads (12 Months): 85,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1391469.1391486
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We are presenting a new concept of an application-specific processor that is capable of transmuting its instruction set according to non-predictive application behavior during run-time. In those scenarios, current (extensible) embedded processors are less efficient since they are not run-time adaptive. We have identified the instruction set selection to be a critical step to perform at run time and hence we focus this paper on that crucial part. Our paradigm conducts as many steps as possible at compile/design time and as little as necessary at run time with the constraint to provide a sufficient flexibility to react to non-predictive application behavior efficiently. We provide an in-depth analysis of our scheme and achieve a speed-up of up to 7.19x (average: 3.63x) compared to state-of-the-art adaptive approaches (like [19]). As an application, we have employed a whole H.264 video encoder though our scheme is by principle applicable to many other embedded applications. Our results are evaluated by an implementation of the instruction set selection for our transmutable processor on an FPGA platform.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Xtensa processor, Tensilica Inc. (http://www.tensilica.com)
 
2
ARCtangent processor. ARC Intl. (http://www.arc.com)
 
3
CoWare Inc, LISA Tek (http://www.coware.com)
 
4
Target Compiler (http://www.retarget.com)
 
5
ASIP Meister (http://asip-solutions.com)
 
6
Stretch processor (http://www.stretchinc.com)
 
7
CoSy compiler, ACE bv (http://www.ace.nl/compiler/cosy.html)
 
8
 
9
10
 
11
 
12
13
 
14
 
15
S. Vassiliadis, D. Soudris, "Fine- and Coarse-Grain Reconfigurable Computing", Springer 2007
 
16
F. Bouwens, M. Berekovic, A. Kanstein, G. Gaydadjiev "Architectural Exploration of the ADRES Coarse-Grained Reconfigurable Array", ARC 2007, pp. 1--13
 
17
18
 
19
 
20
E. Lübbers, M. Platzner "ReconOS: An RTOS supporting Hard- and Software Threads", FPL 2007, pp. 441--446
21
 
22
L. Bauer, M. Shafique, J. Henkel "Efficient Resource Utilization for an Extensible Processor through Dynamic Instruction Set Adaptation", WASP 2007, pp. 39--46
 
23
L. Bauer, M. Shafique, S. Kreutz, J. Henkel "Run-time System for an Extensible Embedded Processor with Dynamic Instruction Set", DATE 2008, pp. 752--757
 
24
 
25
S. Martello, P. Toth "Knapsack problems", Wiley 1990
 
26

Collaborative Colleagues:
Lars Bauer: colleagues
Muhammad Shafique: colleagues
Jörg Henkel: colleagues