| Finding bugs in dynamic web applications |
| Full text |
Pdf
(391 KB)
|
Source
|
International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis
archive
Proceedings of the 2008 international symposium on Software testing and analysis
table of contents
Seattle, WA, USA
SESSION: Web and security
table of contents
Pages 261-272
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-050-0
|
|
Authors
|
|
Shay Artzi
|
MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA
|
|
Adam Kiezun
|
MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA
|
|
Julian Dolby
|
IBM, Yorktown Heights, NY, USA
|
|
Frank Tip
|
IBM, Yorktown Heights, NY, USA
|
|
Danny Dig
|
MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA
|
|
Amit Paradkar
|
IBM, Yorktown Heights, NY, USA
|
|
Michael D. Ernst
|
MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 46, Downloads (12 Months): 427, Citation Count: 5
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
Web script crashes and malformed dynamically-generated Web pages are common errors, and they seriously impact usability of Web applications. Current tools for Web-page validation cannot handle the dynamically-generated pages that are ubiquitous on today's Internet. In this work, we apply a dynamic test generation technique, based on combined concrete and symbolic execution, to the domain of dynamic Web applications. The technique generates tests automatically, uses the tests to detect failures, and minimizes the conditions on the inputs exposing each failure, so that the resulting bug reports are small and useful in finding and fixing the underlying faults. Our tool Apollo implements the technique for PHP. Apollo generates test inputs for the Web application, monitors the application for crashes, and validates that the output conforms to the HTML specification. This paper presents Apollo's algorithms and implementation, and an experimental evaluation that revealed 214 faults in 4 PHP Web applications.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
S. Anand, P. Godefroid, and N. Tillmann. Demand-driven compositional symbolic execution. In TACAS, 2008.
|
| |
2
|
M. Benedikt, J. Freire, and P. Godefroid. VeriWeb: Automatically testing dynamic Web sites. In WWW, 2002.
|
 |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
C. Cadar and D. R. Engler. Execution generated test cases: How to make systems code crash itself. In SPIN, 2005.
|
| |
5
|
C. Cadar and D. R. Engler. Execution generated test cases: How to make systems code crash itself. In SPIN, 2005.
|
 |
6
|
|
 |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
|
| |
9
|
S. Elbaum, K.-R. Chilakamarri, M. Fisher, and G. Rothermel. Web application characterization through directed requests. In WODA, 2006.
|
| |
10
|
|
 |
11
|
|
| |
12
|
M. Fisher, S. G. Elbaum, and G. Rothermel. Dynamic characterization of Web application interfaces. In FASE, 2007.
|
 |
13
|
|
 |
14
|
|
 |
15
|
|
| |
16
|
P. Godefroid, M. Y. Levin, and D. Molnar. Automated whitebox fuzz testing. In NDSS, 2008.
|
 |
17
|
|
 |
18
|
|
 |
19
|
|
| |
20
|
|
| |
21
|
|
 |
22
|
|
 |
23
|
|
 |
24
|
|
| |
25
|
R. O'Callahan. Personal communication, 2008.
|
| |
26
|
T. Pietraszek and C. V. Berghe. Defending against injection attacks through context-sensitive string evaluation. In RAID, 2005.
|
| |
27
|
|
 |
28
|
|
 |
29
|
Sara Sprenkle , Emily Gibson , Sreedevi Sampath , Lori Pollock, Automated replay and failure detection for web applications, Proceedings of the 20th IEEE/ACM international Conference on Automated software engineering, November 07-11, 2005, Long Beach, CA, USA
[doi> 10.1145/1101908.1101947]
|
 |
30
|
|
 |
31
|
|
 |
32
|
|
| |
33
|
|
 |
34
|
|
|