ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Talking the talk vs. walking the walk: salience of information needs in querying vs. browsing
Full text PdfPdf (338 KB)
Source
Annual ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval archive
Proceedings of the 31st annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval table of contents
Singapore, Singapore
POSTER SESSION: Posters group 1: evaluation, text collections and user/personalized IR table of contents
Pages 705-706  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-164-4
Authors
Mikhail Bilenko  Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA, USA
Ryen W. White  Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA, USA
Matthew Richardson  Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA, USA
G. Craig Murray  University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 11,   Downloads (12 Months): 96,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1390334.1390461
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Traditional information retrieval models assume that users express their information needs via text queries (i.e., their "talk"). In this poster, we consider Web browsing behavior outside of interactions with retrieval systems (i.e., users' "walk") as an alternative source of signal describing users' information needs, and compare it to the query-expressed information needs on a large dataset. Our findings demonstrate that information needs expressed in different behavior modalities are largely non-overlapping, and that past behavior in each modality is the most accurate predictor of future behavior in that modality. Results also show that browsing data provides a stronger source of signal than search queries due to its greater volume, which explains previous work that has found implicit behavioral data to be a valuable source of information for user modeling and personalization.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
Gauch, S., Speretta, M., Chandramouli, A., and Micarelli, A. (2007). User profiles for personalized information access. In The Adaptive Web, 54--89, Springer.
3
 
4
Salton, G. and Buckley, C. (1990). Improving Retrieval Performance by Relevance Feedback. J. of the American Society for Information Science, 41(4), 288--297.
 
5
Taylor, R.(1968). Question negotiation and information seeking in libraries. College and Research Libraries, 29,178--194.
6
7


Collaborative Colleagues:
Mikhail Bilenko: colleagues
Ryen W. White: colleagues
Matthew Richardson: colleagues
G. Craig Murray: colleagues