ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Automatically identifying localizable queries
Full text PdfPdf (448 KB)
Source
Annual ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval archive
Proceedings of the 31st annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval table of contents
Singapore, Singapore
SESSION: Query analysis & models--2 table of contents
Pages 507-514  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-164-4
Authors
Michael J. Welch  University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Junghoo Cho  University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 19,   Downloads (12 Months): 233,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1390334.1390421
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Personalization of web search results as a technique for improving user satisfaction has received notable attention in the research community over the past decade. Much of this work focuses on modeling and establishing a profile for each user to aid in personalization. Our work takes a more query-centric approach. In this paper, we present a method for efficient, automatic identification of a class of queries we define as localizable from a web search engine query log. We determine a set of relevant features and use conventional machine learning techniques to classify queries. Our experiments find that our technique is able to identify localizable queries with 94% accuracy.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
C. Buckley, G. Salton, J. Allan, and A. Singhal. Automatic query expansion using SMART: TREC 3. In Text REtrieval Conference, pages 0--, 1994.
 
3
 
4
Y. Freund and R. E. Schapire. Experiments with a new boosting algorithm. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 148--156, 1996.
 
5
 
6
7
8
9
 
10
G. H. John and P. Langley. Estimating continuous distributions in Bayesian classifiers. In Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI '95), pages 338--345, 1995.
11
12
13
 
14
15
 
16
Y.-S. Lee. Morphological analysis for statistical machine translation. In D. M. Susan Dumais and S. Roukos, editors, HLT-NAACL 2004: Short Papers, pages 57--60, Boston, Massachusetts, USA, May 2 - May 7 2004. Association for Computational Linguistics.
17
18
 
19
L. Page, S. Brin, R. Motwani, and T. Winograd. The pagerank citation ranking: Bringing order to the web. Technical report, Stanford Digital Library Technologies Project, 1998.
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
I. Rish. An empirical study of the naive bayes classifier. In IJCAI-01 workshop on "Empirical Methods in AI", 2001.
 
24
25


Collaborative Colleagues:
Michael J. Welch: colleagues
Junghoo Cho: colleagues