ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
TF-IDF uncovered: a study of theories and probabilities
Full text PdfPdf (148 KB)
Source
Annual ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval archive
Proceedings of the 31st annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval table of contents
Singapore, Singapore
SESSION: Probabilistic models table of contents
Pages 435-442  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-164-4
Authors
Thomas Roelleke  Queen Mary, University of London, London, United Kngdm
Jun Wang  Queen Mary, University of London, London, United Kngdm
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 58,   Downloads (12 Months): 500,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1390334.1390409
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Interpretations of TF-IDF are based on binary independence retrieval, Poisson, information theory, and language modelling. This paper contributes a review of existing interpretations, and then, TF-IDF is systematically related to the probabilities P(q|d) and P(d|q). Two approaches are explored: a space of independent, and a space of disjoint terms. For independent terms, an "extreme" query/non-query term assumption uncovers TF-IDF, and an analogy of P(d|q) and the probabilistic odds O(r|d, q) mirrors relevance feedback. For disjoint terms, a relationship between probability theory and TF-IDF is established through the integral + 1/x dx = log x. This study uncovers components such as divergence from randomness and pivoted document length to be inherent parts of a document-query independence (DQI) measure, and interestingly, an integral of the DQI over the term occurrence probability leads to TF-IDF.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
2
 
3
K. Church and W Gale. Inverse document frequency (idf): A measure of deviation from poisson. In Third Workshop on Very Large Corpora, pages 121--130, 1995.
 
4
W.B. Croft and D.J. Harper. Using probabilistic models of document retrieval without relevance information. Journal of Documentation, 35:285--295, 1979.
5
 
6
 
7
Djoerd Hiemstra. A probabilistic justification for using tf.idf term weighting in information retrieval. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 3(2):131--139, 2000.
 
8
John Lafferty and ChengXiang Zhai. Probabilistic Relevance Models Based on Document and Query Generation, chapter 1. Kluwer, 2003.
9
10
 
11
 
12
S.E. Robertson. Understanding inverse document frequency: On theoretical arguments for idf. Journal of Documentation, 60:503--520, 2004.
 
13
S.E. Robertson and K. Sparck Jones. Relevance weighting of search terms. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 27:129--146, 1976.
14
15
16
17


Collaborative Colleagues:
Thomas Roelleke: colleagues
Jun Wang: colleagues