ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Improved Nyström low-rank approximation and error analysis
Full text PdfPdf (355 KB)
Source ICML; Vol. 307 archive
Proceedings of the 25th international conference on Machine learning table of contents
Helsinki, Finland
Pages 1232-1239  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-205-4
Authors
Kai Zhang  Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong
Ivor W. Tsang  Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong
James T. Kwok  Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong
Sponsors
: Yahoo!
: Xerox
IBM : IBM
: NSF
Microsoft Research : Microsoft Research
: Machine Learning Journal/Springer
: Pascal
: University of Helsinki
: Federation of Finnish Learned Societies
: Intel Corporation
: Google
: Helsinki Institute for Information Technology
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 11,   Downloads (12 Months): 50,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1390156.1390311
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Low-rank matrix approximation is an effective tool in alleviating the memory and computational burdens of kernel methods and sampling, as the mainstream of such algorithms, has drawn considerable attention in both theory and practice. This paper presents detailed studies on the Nyström sampling scheme and in particular, an error analysis that directly relates the Nyström approximation quality with the encoding powers of the landmark points in summarizing the data. The resultant error bound suggests a simple and efficient sampling scheme, the k-means clustering algorithm, for Nyström low-rank approximation. We compare it with state-of-the-art approaches that range from greedy schemes to probabilistic sampling. Our algorithm achieves significant performance gains in a number of supervised/unsupervised learning tasks including kernel PCA and least squares SVM.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
3
 
4
Baker, C. (1977). The numerical treatment of integral equations. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
 
5
Belkin, M., & Niyogi, P. (2002). Laplacian eigenmaps and spectral techniques for embedding and clustering. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 14.
 
6
Drineas, P., Drinea, E., & Huggins, P. (2003). An experimental evaluation of a Monte-Carlo algorithm for singular value decomposition. Proceedings of 8th Panhellenic Conference on Informatics (pp. 279--296).
 
7
 
8
Elkan, E. (2003). Using the triangular inequality to accelerate k-means. Proceedings of the 21th International Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 147--153).
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
Golub, G., & Van Loan, C. (1996). Matrix computations. Johns Hopkins University Press. 3rd edition.
 
14
 
15
Lawrence, N. Seeger, M., & Herbrich, R. (2003). Fast sparse Gaussian process methods: The informative vector machine. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. (pp. 625--632). MIT Press.
 
16
Ouimet, M., & Bengio, Y. (2005). Greedy spectral embedding. Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (pp. 253--260).
 
17
Platt, J. C. (2005). Fastmap, MetricMap, and Landmark MDS are all Nyström algorithms. Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (pp. 261--268).
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
Williams, C., & Seeger, M. (2001). Using the Nyströöm method to speed up kernel machines. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 13 (pp. 682--688).
23


Collaborative Colleagues:
Kai Zhang: colleagues
Ivor W. Tsang: colleagues
James T. Kwok: colleagues