ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Democratic approximation of lexicographic preference models
Full text PdfPdf (301 KB)
Source ICML; Vol. 307 archive
Proceedings of the 25th international conference on Machine learning table of contents
Helsinki, Finland
Pages 1200-1207  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-205-4
Authors
Fusun Yaman  University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD
Thomas J. Walsh  Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ
Michael L. Littman  Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ
Marie desJardins  University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD
Sponsors
: Yahoo!
: Xerox
IBM : IBM
: NSF
Microsoft Research : Microsoft Research
: Machine Learning Journal/Springer
: Pascal
: University of Helsinki
: Federation of Finnish Learned Societies
: Intel Corporation
: Google
: Helsinki Institute for Information Technology
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 11,   Downloads (12 Months): 25,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1390156.1390307
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Previous algorithms for learning lexicographic preference models (LPMs) produce a "best guess" LPM that is consistent with the observations. Our approach is more democratic: we do not commit to a single LPM. Instead, we approximate the target using the votes of a collection of consistent LPMs. We present two variations of this method---variable voting and model voting---and empirically show that these democratic algorithms outperform the existing methods. We also introduce an intuitive yet powerful learning bias to prune some of the possible LPMs. We demonstrate how this learning bias can be used with variable and model voting and show that the learning bias improves the learning curve significantly, especially when the number of observations is small.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
Dombi, J., Imreh, C., & Vincze, N. (2007). Learning lexicographic orders. European Journal of Operational Research, 183, 748--756.
 
3
Fishburn, P. (1974). Lexicographic Orders, Utilities and Decision Rules: A Survey. Management Science, 20, 1442--1471.
 
4
Quesada, A. (2003). Negative results in the theory of games with lexicographic utilities. Economics Bulletin, 3, 1--7.
 
5
 
6

Collaborative Colleagues:
Fusun Yaman: colleagues
Thomas J. Walsh: colleagues
Michael L. Littman: colleagues
Marie desJardins: colleagues