ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Bi-level path following for cross validated solution of kernel quantile regression
Full text PdfPdf (445 KB)
Source ICML; Vol. 307 archive
Proceedings of the 25th international conference on Machine learning table of contents
Helsinki, Finland
Pages 840-847  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-205-4
Author
Saharon Rosset  Tel Aviv University, Israel
Sponsors
: Yahoo!
: Xerox
IBM : IBM
: NSF
Microsoft Research : Microsoft Research
: Machine Learning Journal/Springer
: Pascal
: University of Helsinki
: Federation of Finnish Learned Societies
: Intel Corporation
: Google
: Helsinki Institute for Information Technology
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 19,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1390156.1390262
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Modeling of conditional quantiles requires specification of the quantile being estimated and can thus be viewed as a parameterized predictive modeling problem. Quantile loss is typically used, and it is indeed parameterized by a quantile parameter. In this paper we show how to follow the path of cross validated solutions to regularized kernel quantile regression. Even though the bi-level optimization problem we encounter for every quantile is non-convex, the manner in which the optimal cross-validated solution evolves with the parameter of the loss function allows tracking of this solution. We prove this property, construct the resulting algorithm, and demonstrate it on data. This algorithm allows us to efficiently solve the whole family of bi-level problems.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Buchinsky, M. (1994). Changes in the u.s. wage structure 1963--1987: Application of quantile regression. Econometrica, 62, 405--458.
 
2
Eide, E., & Showalter, M. (1998). The effect of school quality on student performance: A quantile regression approach. Economics Letters, 58, 345--350.
 
3
 
4
 
5
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J. (2001). Elements of statistical learning. Springer.
 
6
Kimeldorf, G., & Wahba, G. (1971). Some results on cheby-cheffian spline functions. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 33, 82--95.
 
7
Koenker, R. (2005). Quantile regression. New York: Cambridge University Press.
 
8
Kunapuli, G., Bennett, K. P., Hu, J., & Pang, J.-S. (2007). Bilevel model selection for support vector machines. CRM Proceedings and Lecture Notes. American Mathematical Society, to appear.
 
9
Li, Y., Liu, Y., & Zhu, J. (2007). Quantile regression in reproducing kernel hilbert spaces. JASA, 102.
 
10
11
 
12
Rosset, S. (2008). Bi-level path following for cross validated solution of kernel quantile regression. In preparation, evolving draft available at www.tau.ac.il/~saharon/papers/cvpath.pdf.
 
13
Rosset, S., & Zhu, J. (2007). Piecewise linear regularized solution paths. Annals of Statistics, 35.
 
14
Schölkopf, B., & Smola, A. (2002). Learning with kernels. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
 
15
 
16
 
17
18