ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Learning dissimilarities by ranking: from SDP to QP
Full text PdfPdf (604 KB)
Source ICML; Vol. 307 archive
Proceedings of the 25th international conference on Machine learning table of contents
Helsinki, Finland
Pages 728-735  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-205-4
Authors
Hua Ouyang  Georgia Institute of Technology
Alex Gray  Georgia Institute of Technology
Sponsors
: Yahoo!
: Xerox
IBM : IBM
: NSF
Microsoft Research : Microsoft Research
: Machine Learning Journal/Springer
: Pascal
: University of Helsinki
: Federation of Finnish Learned Societies
: Intel Corporation
: Google
: Helsinki Institute for Information Technology
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 7,   Downloads (12 Months): 32,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1390156.1390248
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We consider the problem of learning dissimilarities between points via formulations which preserve a specified ordering between points rather than the numerical values of the dissimilarities. Dissimilarity ranking (d-ranking) learns from instances like "A is more similar to B than C is to D" or "The distance between E and F is larger than that between G and H". Three formulations of d-ranking problems are presented and new algorithms are presented for two of them, one by semidefinite programming (SDP) and one by quadratic programming (QP). Among the novel capabilities of these approaches are out-of-sample prediction and scalability to large problems.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Agarwal, S. (2007). Generalized non-metric multidimensional scaling. AISTATS 07.
 
2
Borg, I., & Groenen, P. J. (2005). Modern multidimensional scaling: Theory and applications. New York: Springer.
 
3
Chang, C.-C., & Lin, C.-J. (2001). LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines. Software available at http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/~cjlin/libsvm.
 
4
 
5
Goldberger, J., Roweis, S., Hinton, G., & Salakhutdinov, R. (2004). Neighbourhood Components Analysis. NIPS.
 
6
 
7
Herbrich, R., Graepel, T., & Obermayer, K. (1999). Large margin rank boundaries for ordinal regression. Advances in Large Margin Classifiers, 115--132.
8
 
9
Kimeldorf, G., & Wahba, G. (1971). Some Results on Tchebycheffian Spline Functions. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 33, 82--75.
 
10
Kondor, R., & Jebara, T. (2006). Gaussian and Wishart Hyperkernels. NIPS.
 
11
Kwok, J. T., & Tsang, I. W. (2003). Learning with Idealized Kernels. ICML.
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
Schultz, M., & Joachims, T. (2003). Learning a Distance Metric from Relative Comparisons. NIPS.
 
16
Strum, J. F. (1999). Using SeDuMi 1.02, A Matlab toolbox for optimization over symmetric cones. Optimization Methods and Software, 11.
 
17
Tenenbaum, J. B., de Silva, V., & Langford, J. C. (2000). A Global Geometric Framework for Nonlinear Dimensionality Reduction. Science, 290, 2319--2323.
 
18
 
19
Xing, E. P., Ng, A. Y., Jordan, M. I., & Russell, S. (2002). Distance Metric Learning with Application to Clustering with Side-Information. NIPS.