| SpiderCrab and the emergent object: designing for the twenty-first century |
| Full text |
Pdf
(381 KB)
|
| Source
|
Designing For User Experiences
archive
Proceedings of the 2007 conference on Designing for User eXperiences
table of contents
Chicago, Illinois
SESSION: A very big picture
table of contents
Article No. 3
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-60558-308-2
|
|
Authors
|
|
Mick Wallis
|
University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
|
|
Sita Popat
|
University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
|
|
Alice Bayliss
|
University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
|
|
Joslin McKinney
|
University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
|
|
John Bryden
|
University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
|
|
David Hogg
|
University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
|
|
Matthew Godden
|
Shadow Robot Company Ltd., London, United Kingdom
|
|
Rich Walker
|
Shadow Robot Company Ltd., London, United Kingdom
|
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4, Downloads (12 Months): 75, Citation Count: 0
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
This paper presents the development of the robotic prototype SpiderCrab in the context of Emergent Objects 2 (EO2), a portfolio of sub-projects funded by the EPSRC/AHRC 'Designing for the Twenty-first Century' initiative. We report first on explorations across EO2 into how performance knowledge and practice can help to understand and facilitate emergence in the context of the design process, including its outcomes. Turning to SpiderCrab, conceived of as a mediation between dancing partner and architectural environment, we report on the performance-led process undertaken by an interdisciplinary team in pursuit of performative merging between the robot and its human partner. We conclude by reflecting on the relationships between expressive and responsive modes in the conduct of design for user experience.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
Deleuze, G. The Fold: Liebniz and the Baroque. trans. Tom Conley, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1993.
|
| |
2
|
Cox, G. Cox Review of Creativity in Business: building on the UK's strengths. London: HMSO, 2005.
|
| |
3
|
ibid.
|
| |
4
|
Bayliss, K. A., Sheridan J. G. & Villar, N. New shapes on the dance floor: influencing ambient sound and vision with computationally augmented poi. International Journal of Performance Arts and Digital Media, 1(1), 2005, 67--82.
|
| |
5
|
Huizinga, J. Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play-Element in Culture. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1949.
|
| |
6
|
Caillois, R. Man, Play and Games, trans Meyer Barash. University of Illinois Press, 1958, 2001.
|
| |
7
|
Csikszentmihalyi, M. Creativity, Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention. New York: HarperCollins, 1996.
|
| |
8
|
Deleuze, G & Guattari F. A Thousand Plateaus. Capitalism and Schizophrenia, trans Brian Massumi. London: Continuum, 1980, 1987.
|
| |
9
|
Sheridan, J.G., Dix, A., Lock, S. & Bayliss, A. Understanding interaction in ubiquitous guerrilla performances in playful arenas. Fincher, P. Markopolous, D. Moore, & R. Ruddle eds, People and Computers XVIII-Design for Life: 18th British HCI Group Annual Conference, Leeds, UK. London: Springer, 2004, pp. 3-17.
|
| |
10
|
Schechner, R. Performance Theory. London: Routledge, 1988.
|
| |
11
|
Schön, D, A. The Reflective Practitioner: How professionals think in action. NY: Basic Books, 1983.
|
| |
12
|
Williams, R. Drama from Ibsen to Brecht. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1973.
|
| |
13
|
Bourdieu, P. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
|
| |
14
|
Popat, S & Palmer, S. Creating Common Ground: Dialogues between performance and digital technologies. International Journal of Performance Arts & Digital Media 1(1), 2005, 47--65.
|
| |
15
|
Heidegger, M. The question concerning technology. The Question Concerning Technology, and other essays, trans William Lovitt. New York, London: Harper and Row, 1949, 1977.
|
| |
16
|
Idhe, D. Postphenomenology. Essays in the postmodern context, Evanstown Ill: Northwestern University Press, 1993.
|
| |
17
|
Wallis, M. Thinking through technē. Performance Research 10(4), 2005, pp. 1--8
|
| |
18
|
|
| |
19
|
Boal, A. Games for Actors and Non-actors, trans Adrian Jackson, 2nd edn. London: Routledge, 2002.
|
| |
20
|
Brooks, Rodney A. <u>"A Robot That Walks; Emergent Behaviors from a Carefully Evolved Network"</u>, MIT AI Lab Memo 1091, February 1989.
|
| |
21
|
|
| |
22
|
|
| |
23
|
Neagle, R. J., Ng, K. & Ruddle, R. A. Developing a Virtual Ballet Dancer to Visualise Choreography. Proceedings of the AISB, 2004.
|
| |
24
|
Laban, R. The Mastery of Movement. Plays Inc, 1971
|
| |
25
|
|
| |
26
|
Merquior, J. G. Spider and bee: towards a critique of the postmodern ideology. L. Appignansi ed, Postmodernism. ICA Documents. London: Free Association Books, 1989, pp. 41--48
|
|