ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
SpiderCrab and the emergent object: designing for the twenty-first century
Full text PdfPdf (381 KB)
Source Designing For User Experiences archive
Proceedings of the 2007 conference on Designing for User eXperiences table of contents
Chicago, Illinois
SESSION: A very big picture table of contents
Article No. 3  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-60558-308-2
Authors
Mick Wallis  University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
Sita Popat  University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
Alice Bayliss  University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
Joslin McKinney  University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
John Bryden  University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
David Hogg  University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
Matthew Godden  Shadow Robot Company Ltd., London, United Kingdom
Rich Walker  Shadow Robot Company Ltd., London, United Kingdom
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 75,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1389908.1389912
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper presents the development of the robotic prototype SpiderCrab in the context of Emergent Objects 2 (EO2), a portfolio of sub-projects funded by the EPSRC/AHRC 'Designing for the Twenty-first Century' initiative. We report first on explorations across EO2 into how performance knowledge and practice can help to understand and facilitate emergence in the context of the design process, including its outcomes.

Turning to SpiderCrab, conceived of as a mediation between dancing partner and architectural environment, we report on the performance-led process undertaken by an interdisciplinary team in pursuit of performative merging between the robot and its human partner. We conclude by reflecting on the relationships between expressive and responsive modes in the conduct of design for user experience.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Deleuze, G. The Fold: Liebniz and the Baroque. trans. Tom Conley, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1993.
 
2
Cox, G. Cox Review of Creativity in Business: building on the UK's strengths. London: HMSO, 2005.
 
3
ibid.
 
4
Bayliss, K. A., Sheridan J. G. & Villar, N. New shapes on the dance floor: influencing ambient sound and vision with computationally augmented poi. International Journal of Performance Arts and Digital Media, 1(1), 2005, 67--82.
 
5
Huizinga, J. Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play-Element in Culture. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1949.
 
6
Caillois, R. Man, Play and Games, trans Meyer Barash. University of Illinois Press, 1958, 2001.
 
7
Csikszentmihalyi, M. Creativity, Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention. New York: HarperCollins, 1996.
 
8
Deleuze, G & Guattari F. A Thousand Plateaus. Capitalism and Schizophrenia, trans Brian Massumi. London: Continuum, 1980, 1987.
 
9
Sheridan, J.G., Dix, A., Lock, S. & Bayliss, A. Understanding interaction in ubiquitous guerrilla performances in playful arenas. Fincher, P. Markopolous, D. Moore, & R. Ruddle eds, People and Computers XVIII-Design for Life: 18th British HCI Group Annual Conference, Leeds, UK. London: Springer, 2004, pp. 3-17.
 
10
Schechner, R. Performance Theory. London: Routledge, 1988.
 
11
Schön, D, A. The Reflective Practitioner: How professionals think in action. NY: Basic Books, 1983.
 
12
Williams, R. Drama from Ibsen to Brecht. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1973.
 
13
Bourdieu, P. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
 
14
Popat, S & Palmer, S. Creating Common Ground: Dialogues between performance and digital technologies. International Journal of Performance Arts & Digital Media 1(1), 2005, 47--65.
 
15
Heidegger, M. The question concerning technology. The Question Concerning Technology, and other essays, trans William Lovitt. New York, London: Harper and Row, 1949, 1977.
 
16
Idhe, D. Postphenomenology. Essays in the postmodern context, Evanstown Ill: Northwestern University Press, 1993.
 
17
Wallis, M. Thinking through technē. Performance Research 10(4), 2005, pp. 1--8
 
18
 
19
Boal, A. Games for Actors and Non-actors, trans Adrian Jackson, 2nd edn. London: Routledge, 2002.
 
20
Brooks, Rodney A. <u>"A Robot That Walks; Emergent Behaviors from a Carefully Evolved Network"</u>, MIT AI Lab Memo 1091, February 1989.
 
21
 
22
 
23
Neagle, R. J., Ng, K. & Ruddle, R. A. Developing a Virtual Ballet Dancer to Visualise Choreography. Proceedings of the AISB, 2004.
 
24
Laban, R. The Mastery of Movement. Plays Inc, 1971
 
25
 
26
Merquior, J. G. Spider and bee: towards a critique of the postmodern ideology. L. Appignansi ed, Postmodernism. ICA Documents. London: Free Association Books, 1989, pp. 41--48

Collaborative Colleagues:
Mick Wallis: colleagues
Sita Popat: colleagues
Alice Bayliss: colleagues
Joslin McKinney: colleagues
John Bryden: colleagues
David Hogg: colleagues
Matthew Godden: colleagues
Rich Walker: colleagues