ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
An analysis of adaptive windowing for time series forecasting in dynamic environments: further tests of the DyFor GP model
Full text PdfPdf (205 KB)
Source
Genetic And Evolutionary Computation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 10th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation table of contents
Atlanta, GA, USA
SESSION: Real-world application papers table of contents
Pages 1657-1664  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-130-9
Authors
Neal Wagner  Augusta State University, Augusta, GA, USA
Zbigniew Michalewicz  University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland and Polish-Japanese Institute of Information Technology, Warsaw, Poland
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGEVO: ACM Special Interest Group on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 5,   Downloads (12 Months): 61,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1389095.1389406
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Genetic Programming (GP) has proved its applicability for time series forecasting in a number of studies. The Dynamic Forecasting Genetic Program (DyFor GP) model builds on the GP technique by adding features that are tailored for the forecasting of time series whose underlying data-generating processes are non-static. Such time series often appear for real-world forecasting concerns in which environmental conditions are constantly changing. In a previous study the DyFor GP model was shown to improve upon the performance of GP and other benchmark models for a set of simulated and real time series. The distinctive feature of DyFor GP is its adaptive data window adjustment. This feedback-driven window adjustment is designed to automatically hone in on the currently active process in an environment where the generating process varies over time. This study further investigates this adaptive windowing technique and provides an analysis of its dynamics for constructed time series with non-static data-generating processes. Results show that DyFor GP is able to capture the moving processes more accurately than standard GP and offer insight for further improvements to DyFor GP.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Eiben A., Hinterding R., and Michalewicz Z. Parameter control in evolutionary algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 3:124--141, 1999.
 
2
Henon M. A two-dimensional mapping with a strange attractor. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 50:69, 1976.
 
3
Iba H. and Nikolaev N. Genetic programming polynomial models of financial data series. In Proceedings of the 2000 Congress of Evolutionary Computation, pages 1459--1466. IEEE, 2000.
 
4
Kaboudan M. Genetic evolution of regression models for business and economic forecasting. In Proceedings of the 1999 Congress of Evolutionary Computation, pages 1260--1268. IEEE, 1999.
 
5
 
6
Kaboudan M. Genetically evolved models and normality of their residuals. Journal of Economics Dynamics and Control, 25:1719--1749, 2001.
 
7
Kaboudan M. Forecasting with computer-evolved model specifications: a genetic programming application. Computer and Operations Research, 30:1661--1681, 2003.
 
8
 
9
Mackey M. and Glass L. Oscillation and chaos in physiological control systems. Science, 197:287, 1977.
 
10
Makridakis, S., Wheelwright, S., and Hyndman, R. Forecasting: Methods and Applications. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, 1998.
 
11
May R. Simple mathematical models with very complicated dynamics. Nature, 261:459--467, 1976.
 
12
May R. Simple mathematical models with very complicated dynamics. Nature, 261:459--467, 1976.
 
13
Neely C. and Weller P. Predicting exchange rate volatility: genetic programming versus GARCH and RiskMetrics. Technical report, The Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, 2002.
 
14
Oakley H. Genetic programming for nonlinear equation fitting to chaotic data. In Back T., Fogel D., and Michalewicz Z., editor, Handbook of Evolutionary Computation. Oxford University Press, 1997.
 
15
Ozaki, T. Non-linear time series models and dynamical systems. In Hannan E., Krishnaiah P., Rao M., editor, Handbook of Statistics. Elsevier, 1985.
 
16
South Australian Partnership for Advanced Computing. High performance and grid computing - hydra cluster. http://www.sapac.edu.au/systems/hydra/index.html, 2007.
 
17
Wagner N. and Michalewicz Z. Genetic programming with efficient population control for financial times series prediction. In 2001 Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Late Breaking Papers, pages 458--462, 2001.
 
18
Wagner N., Michalewicz Z., Khouja M., and McGregor R. Time series forecasting for dynamic environments: the DyFor genetic program model. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 11(4):433--452, 2007.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Neal Wagner: colleagues
Zbigniew Michalewicz: colleagues