ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Computing finite size representations of the set of approximate solutions of an MOP with stochastic search algorithms
Full text PdfPdf (524 KB)
Source
Genetic And Evolutionary Computation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 10th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation table of contents
Atlanta, GA, USA
SESSION: Evolutionary multiobjective optimization papers table of contents
Pages 713-720  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-130-9
Authors
Oliver Schuetze  CINVESTAV-IPN, Mexico City, Mexico
Carlos A. Coello Coello  CINVESTAV-IPN, Mexico City, Mexico
Emilia Tantar  INRIA Futurs, Lille, France
El-Ghazali Talbi  INRIA Futurs, Lille, France
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGEVO: ACM Special Interest Group on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 36,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1389095.1389233
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In this work we study the convergence of generic stochastic search algorithms toward the entire set of approximate solutions of continuous multi-objective optimization problems. Since the dimension of the set of interest is typically equal to the dimension of the parameter space, we focus on obtaining a finite and tight approximation, measured by the Hausdorff distance. Under mild assumptions about the process to generate new candidate solutions, the limit approximation set will be determined entirely by the archiving strategy. We propose and investigate a novel archiving strategy theoretically and empirically. For this, we analyze the convergence behavior of the algorithm, yielding bounds on the obtained approximation quality as well as on the cardinality of the resulting approximation, and present some numerical results.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
 
3
A. Engau and M. M. Wiecek. Generating epsilon-efficient solutions in multiobjective programming. European Journal of Operational Research, 177(3):1566--1579, 2007.
 
4
J. D. Knowles and D. W. Corne. Metaheuristics for Multiobjective Optimisation, volume 535 of Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, chapter Bounded Pareto Archiving: Theory and Practice, pages 39--64. Springer, 2004.
 
5
 
6
P. Loridan. ε-solutions in vector minimization problems. Journal of Optimization, Theory and Application, 42:265--276, 1984.
 
7
Günter Rudolph and Alexandru Agapie. Convergence Properties of Some Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms. In Proceedings of the 2000 Conference on Evolutionary Computation, volume 2, pages 1010--1016, Piscataway, New Jersey, July 2000. IEEE Press.
 
8
 
9
 
10
O. Schütze, C. A. Coello Coello, and E.-G. Talbi. Approximating the ε-efficient set of an MOP with stochastic search algorithms. In A. Gelbukh and A. F. Kuri Morales, editors, Mexican International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (MICAI-2007), pages 128--138. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2007.
 
11
O. Schütze, M. Laumanns, C. A. Coello Coello, M. Dellnitz, and E.-G. Talbi. Convergence of stochastic search algorithms to finite size Pareto set approximations. To appear in Journal of Global Optimization, 2007.
 
12
W. Stadler and J. Dauer. Multicriteria optimization in engineering: A tutorial and survey. In M. P. Kamat, editor, Structural Optimization: Status and Future, pages 209--249. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1992.
 
13
M. Tanaka. GA-based decision support system for multi-criteria optimization. In Proceedings of International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, pages 1556--1561, 1995.
 
14
E. Tantar, O. Schütze, J. R. Figueira, C. A. Coello Coello, and E.-G. Talbi. Computing and selecting ε-efficient solutions of {0,1}-knapsack problems. To appear in Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM-2008), 2008.
 
15
 
16
D. J. White. Epsilon-dominating solutions in mean-variance portfolio analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 105(3):457--466, 1998.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Oliver Schuetze: colleagues
Carlos A. Coello Coello: colleagues
Emilia Tantar: colleagues
El-Ghazali Talbi: colleagues