ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Investigating restricted tournament replacement in ECGA for non-stationary environments
Full text PdfPdf (188 KB)
Source
Genetic And Evolutionary Computation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 10th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation table of contents
Atlanta, GA, USA
SESSION: Estimation of distribution algorithms papers table of contents
Pages 439-446  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-130-9
Authors
Claudio F. Lima  University of Algarve, Faro, Portugal
Carlos Fernandes  Technical University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
Fernando G. Lobo  University of Algarve, Faro, Portugal
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGEVO: ACM Special Interest Group on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 31,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1389095.1389175
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper investigates the incorporation of restricted tournament replacement (RTR) in the extended compact genetic algorithm (ECGA) for solving problems with non-stationary optima. RTR is a simple yet efficient niching method used to maintain diversity in a population of individuals. While the original version of RTR uses Hamming distance to quantify similarity between individuals, we propose an alternative substructural distance to enforce the niches. The ECGA that restarts the search after a change of environment is compared with the approach of maintaining diversity, using both versions of RTR. Results on several dynamic decomposable test problems demonstrate the usefulness of maintaining diversity throughout the run over the approach of restarting the search from scratch at each change. Furthermore, by maintaining diversity no additional mechanisms are required to detect the change of environment, which is typically a problem-dependent and non-trivial task.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
H. A. Abbass, K. Sastry, and D. E. Goldberg. Oiling the wheels of change: The role of adaptive automatic problem decomposition in non-stationary environments. IlliGAL Report No. 2004029, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Illinois Genetic Algorithms Laboratory, Urbana, IL, 2004.
 
2
 
3
 
4
K. Deb and D. E. Goldberg. Analyzing deception in trap functions. Foundations of Genetic Algorithms 2, pages 93--108, 1993.
 
5
 
6
 
7
G. Harik, F. G. Lobo, and K. Sastry. Linkage learning via probabilistic modeling in the ECGA. In M. Pelikan, K. Sastry, and E. Cantu-Paz, editors, Scalable Optimization via Probabilistic Modeling: From Algorithms to Applications, pages 39--61. Springer, 2006.
 
8
 
9
G. R. Harik. Linkage learning via probabilistic modeling in the ECGA. IlliGAL Report No. 99010, Illinois Genetic Algorithms Laboratory, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 1999.
 
10
Y. Jin and J. Branke. Evolutionary optimization in uncertain environments-a survey. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 9(3):303--317, 2005.
 
11
 
12
C. F. Lima, C. Fernandes, and F. G. Lobo. Investigating restricted tournament replacement in ECGA for non-stationary environments. IlliGAL Report No. 2008007, Illinois Genetic Algorithms Laboratory, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 2008.
 
13
M. Pelikan. Hierarchical Bayesian Optimization Algorithm: Toward a New Generation of Evolutionary Algorithms. Springer, 2005.
 
14
 
15
J. J. Rissanen. Modelling by shortest data description. Automatica, 14:465--471, 1978.
 
16
K. Sastry, H. A. Abbass, and D. E. Goldberg. Sub-structural niching in non--stationary environments. In Proceedings of the 17th Australian Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, LNAI 3339, pages 873--885. Springer, 2004.
17
 
18
K. Sastry, M. Pelikan, and D. E. Goldberg. Efficiency enhancement of genetic algorithms via building-block-wise fitness estimation. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation, pages 720--727, 2004.
 
19
D. H. Wolpert and W. G. Macready. No Free Lunch Theorems for Optimization. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 1(1):67--82, 1997.
 
20
S. Yang. Constructing dynamic test environments for genetic algorithms based on problem difficulty. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation, pages 1262--1269. IEEE Press, 2004.
 
21
22
23

Collaborative Colleagues:
Claudio F. Lima: colleagues
Carlos Fernandes: colleagues
Fernando G. Lobo: colleagues