ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Digital Library logoTake a look at the new version of this page: [ beta version ]. Tell us what you think.
Designing multi-rover emergent specialization
Full text PdfPdf (447 KB)
Source
Genetic And Evolutionary Computation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 10th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation table of contents
Atlanta, GA, USA
SESSION: Artificial life, evolutionary robotics, adaptive behavior, evolvable hardware papers table of contents
Pages: 233-240  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-130-9
Authors
Geoff Nitschke  Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Martijn Schut  Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGEVO: ACM Special Interest Group on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 28,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1389095.1389132
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We compare the efficacy of the Enforced Sub-Populations (ESP) and Collective Neuro-Evolution (CONE) methods for designing behavioral specialization in a multi-rover collective behavior task. These methods are tested for Artificial Neural Network (ANN) controller design in an extension of the multi-rover task, where behavioral specialization is known to benefit task performance. The task is for multiple simulated autonomous vehicles (rovers) to maximize the detection of points of interest (red rocks) in a virtual environment. The task requires rovers to collectively sense such points of interest in order for them to be detected. Results indicate that the CONE method facilitates a level of specialization appropriate for achieving a significantly higher task performance, comparative to rover teams evolved by the ESP method.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
A. Agogino and K. Tumer. Efficient evaluation functions for multi-rover systems. In Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, pages 1--12, New York, USA, 2004. Springer-Verlag.
 
2
 
3
A. Eiben. Multiparent recombination. In T. B. D. Fogel and Z. Michalewicz, editors, Evolutionary Computation 1: Basic Algorithms and Operators, pages 289--307. Institute of Physics Publishing, Ottawa, Canada, 2000.
 
4
 
5
 
6
B. Flannery, S. Teukolsky, and W. Vetterling. Numerical Recipes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1986.
 
7
J. Gautrais, G. Theraulaz, J. Deneubourg, and C. Anderson. Emergent polyethism as a consequence of increased colony size in insect societies. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 215(1):363--373, 2002.
 
8
 
9
 
10
G. Nitschke, M. Schut, and A. Eiben. Collective specialization for evolutionary design of a multi-robot system. In Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Swarm Robotics, pages 189--206, Rome, Italy, September 2006. Springer.
 
11
G. Nitschke, M. Schut, and A. Eiben. Emergent specialization in the extended multi-rover problem. In Proceedings of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, pages 100--106, Singapore, 2007. IEEE.
 
12
 
13
 
14
M. Wineberg and F. Oppacher. The underlying similarity of diversity measures used in evolutionary computation. In Proceedings of the Fifth Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, pages 1493--1504, Berlin, 2003. Springer.
 
15


Collaborative Colleagues:
Geoff Nitschke: colleagues
Martijn Schut: colleagues